Fix #12375 New Catalog issue with WFS service#12378
Merged
Merged
Conversation
1 task
dsuren1
approved these changes
May 14, 2026
dsuren1
reviewed
May 14, 2026
| references, | ||
| ogcReferences | ||
| ogcReferences, | ||
| identifier: uuidv1() |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@allyoucanmap I think this causes a new issue, sorry I merged it accidentally
tms-identifier.mp4
5 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
The missing identifier in the WFS catalog implementation was causing the problem. This PR includes also missing identifier in other catalogs implementations
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x", remove the others)
Issue
What is the current behavior?
#12375
What is the new behavior?
Fix multiselect selection for WFS catalogs
Breaking change
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x", remove the other)
Other useful information