Experimental: unify sidebar row geometry - #2859
Closed
brsbl wants to merge 6 commits into
Closed
Conversation
This was referenced Sep 1, 2026
Collaborator
Author
|
Closing this experimental layer for now. The approved sidebar and command-palette stack remains separate; any future thread-list work will restart incrementally from the stable baseline. Branch retained for reference. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Human comments
What was wrong
Sidebar row families independently owned status, caret, identity, action, and nesting geometry, making column alignment and spacing changes drift across row types.
What changed
No public or wire contracts changed.
Screenshots
Pending; this PR is intentionally experimental and not merge-ready.
How you verified
git diff --checkFixes #
BB-Thread-ID: thr_ccffp4w2p2