project_id (numeric value) not any more visible

[mfrasca]

the raven doc page http://sentry.readthedocs.org/en/latest/developer/client/index.html#parsing-the-dsn says how to parse a sentry dsn.
currently (as of 4.0.6) this is reported as the character name, while sentry expects the numeric value of the pk primary key.

[dcramer]

You'll need to update your Sentry server

[mfrasca]

with 4.0.11, the dsn looks like this
http://654877c851f9499a951486fd7a0ae5e6:ba71e150ed854b2088c48295e39bf3ca@192.168.10.127:9000/default
while according to the docs it should be of this form
http://654877c851f9499a951486fd7a0ae5e6:ba71e150ed854b2088c48295e39bf3ca@192.168.10.127:9000/1

I can log to project number 1.
I can also log to project "default"...

but with 4.0.11 I also have a new funny warning:
Client '2012-04-18 20:59:43' passed an invalid value for timestamp 'r-logging.handler'

I will check whether it was me messing up things somewhere... so many layers, I'm sure things can go wrong...

[dcramer]

The 4.x series introduced slugs. I'm going to update documentation, but clients ideally should allow the project id to be passed as a string, and the new server
will allow either.

David Cramer

twitter.com/zeeg
disqus.com/zeeg

On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Mario Frasca wrote:

with 4.0.11, the dsn looks like this
http://654877c851f9499a951486fd7a0ae5e6:ba71e150ed854b2088c48295e39bf3ca@192.168.10.127:9000/default
while according to the docs it should be of this form
http://654877c851f9499a951486fd7a0ae5e6:ba71e150ed854b2088c48295e39bf3ca@192.168.10.127:9000/1

I can log to project number 1.
logging to project "by name" does not have any effect.

but with 4.0.11 I also have a new funny warning:
Client '2012-04-18 20:59:43' passed an invalid value for timestamp 'r-logging.handler'

I will check whether it was me messing up things somewhere... so many layers, I'm sure things can go wrong...

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/dcramer/sentry/issues/435#issuecomment-5206158

[mfrasca]

yes, you are right. and the docs in fact do not state that the PROJECT_ID part must be numeric. I only concluded it from the examples and from previous experience.

[mfrasca]

(but thinking harder about it... the numeric value is not visible any more, while it still is accepted. don't you think it's a bit contradictory? why not include it somehow in the information page for the project?)

[dcramer]

For now we're reverting the change to slugs in DSNs until we can get all clients updated and come up with a cleaner transition strategy. They'll still be accepted (as well as numeric IDs), but the pages will show the numeric value.

David Cramer

twitter.com/zeeg
disqus.com/zeeg

On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Mario Frasca wrote:

(but thinking harder about it... the numeric value is not visible any more, while it still is accepted. don't you think it's a bit contradictory? why not include it somehow in the information page for the project?)

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/dcramer/sentry/issues/435#issuecomment-5207191

[mfrasca]

comparing issue and docs, it looks fine to me. closing.