-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
ref(api): mark previous enterprise endpoints as unowned #111002
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ def validate_trigger_type(self, trigger_type: str) -> int: | |
| @cell_silo_endpoint | ||
| class ReleaseThresholdEndpoint(ProjectEndpoint): | ||
| permission_classes = (ProjectReleasePermission,) | ||
| owner: ApiOwner = ApiOwner.ENTERPRISE | ||
| owner: ApiOwner = ApiOwner.UNOWNED | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. These are a lot of what rotational was doing. @mrduncan do you know who would take release tasks now?
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @bruno-garcia releases are effectively unowned at the moment, right? |
||
| publish_status = { | ||
| "GET": ApiPublishStatus.EXPERIMENTAL, | ||
| "POST": ApiPublishStatus.EXPERIMENTAL, | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@swartzrock my understanding is that some of these would be owned by product platform team. Maybe we should transfer them now?