Rust: Consistency fix for reusables/extractors.rst. #20554
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
geoffw0
added
no-change-note-required
github-actions
bot
added
documentation
and removed
Rust
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR fixes a formatting inconsistency in the extractors documentation by adding a missing asterisk (*) to the Rust language entry in what appears to be a reStructuredText list.
- Corrects list formatting for the Rust language entry
- Ensures consistency with other language entries in the table/list structure
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Consistency fix for
reusables/extractors.rst- I noticed a*was missing in the list.I'd appreciate a 👍 from someone on the docs team who understands how this is rendered.