-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
CPP: Exclude template code from ExprHasNoEffect.ql #430
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
73b186a
CPP: Add test case.
geoffw0 7bf9200
CPP: Fix (it looks like we already had a similar test, both are fixed.
geoffw0 5f12c18
CPP: Change note.
geoffw0 d6f27f0
CPP: Add a test of macros.
geoffw0 5b09e11
CPP: Repair macro case.
geoffw0 3f0e28a
CPP: Fix additional expr_has_no_effect test.
geoffw0 09782d1
CPP: Annotate expr_has_no_effect test.
geoffw0 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion
1
cpp/ql/test/library-tests/queries/expr_has_no_effect/expr_has_no_effect.expected
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions
7
cpp/ql/test/query-tests/Likely Bugs/Likely Typos/ExprHasNoEffect/macros.c
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | ||
|
|
||
| #define UNUSED(x) (x) | ||
|
|
||
| void test2(int param) | ||
| { | ||
| UNUSED(param); // GOOD | ||
| } |
22 changes: 22 additions & 0 deletions
22
cpp/ql/test/query-tests/Likely Bugs/Likely Typos/ExprHasNoEffect/template.cpp
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ | ||
|
|
||
| template<class T> | ||
| void Increment(T &t) { | ||
| t++; // GOOD (sometimes has an effect) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| class Nothing { | ||
| public: | ||
| Nothing operator++(int) { | ||
| return *this; // do nothing | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| void myTemplateTest() { | ||
| int i = 0; | ||
| Nothing n; | ||
|
|
||
| i++; // GOOD (always has an effect) | ||
| n++; // BAD (never has an effect) | ||
| Increment(i); | ||
| Increment(n); | ||
| } |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why remove the macro check? Is it redundant because
parent.isInMacroExpansion()is checked below?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, I didn't really intend to remove it. I was curious whether that line affected any of the tests, and it didn't, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's truly doing nothing. I'll add some test cases for the relationship between this and
parent.isInMacroExpansion()and probably reinstate it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've added a test case for macros and reinstated the macro check. I now think it's actually the other macro clause that might be redundant - but with no explanatory comments or test cases, and few real world results that care, I'm not confident.