Daily Firewall Report2026-08-04 #50158
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Daily Firewall Logs Collector and Reporter. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #50461. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🔥 Executive Summary
Report Date: 2026-08-04 · Scope: Last 7 days · Workflow runs analyzed: 50 (across 26 distinct firewall-enabled workflows)
Firewall activity over the past week was light and largely benign: 3,045 total network requests were monitored across the 50 runs, with only 30 (0.99%) blocked. Blocked traffic came from just two workflows and was dominated by Google service/telemetry domains reached transitively by browser-automation tooling (
Daily Model Inventory Checker) and a single Go module-proxy call fromDocumentation Unbloat. No suspicious or clearly malicious domains were observed. SSL Bump and DLP inspection were disabled on the sampled runs, so blocking decisions reflect allowlist matching only (no content-based policy).📊 Key Metrics
🚫 Top Blocked Domains
📋 Policy Configuration
Sampled firewall policy (from a representative recent run): 11 rules, SSL Bump disabled, DLP disabled. The policy chain is a standard allow-then-default-deny structure: topology-peer allows → unsafe-port denies → api-proxy sidecar allow → raw-IP denies → domain allowlist (
allow-both-plain/allow-both-regex) →deny-default(catch-all).Rule-level hit counts were not available in the cached logs sampled for this run (the underlying
audit.jsonltraces retained only rawTCP_TUNNEL/NONE_NONEproxy decisions, not per-rule attribution), so a full rule-hit table and denied-request-by-rule breakdown could not be produced this cycle. All 30 blocked requests matched the implicitdeny-defaultcatch-all (i.e., the destination domains were simply absent from each workflow'sallowed_domainslist).Detailed Request Patterns by Workflow
View Detailed Request Patterns by Workflow
Workflow: Daily Model Inventory Checker (1 run analyzed)
Workflow: Documentation Unbloat (1 run analyzed)
All other 24 workflows analyzed had zero blocked requests.
Complete Blocked Domains List
View Complete Blocked Domains List
🔒 Security Recommendations
Daily Model Inventory Checker: if this workflow legitimately needs to launch a Chrome/Chromium instance (e.g., for scraping model pricing pages), consider allowlisting*.google.com,*.googleapis.com, and*.gstatic.com, or better, run the browser with--disable-features=Autofilland safe-browsing disabled to avoid these calls entirely rather than widening the firewall allowlist.Documentation Unbloat: if it invokesgotooling that needs the module proxy, addproxy.golang.org(and typicallysum.golang.org) to itsallowed_domainsfrontmatter — this is a standard, low-risk addition already allowlisted by many other workflows in this repo.gh aw audit --run-id <id>with debug logging (DEBUG=cli:*) on a future run, or checking whetherpolicy-manifest.json/rule-hit counters can be persisted to the artifact bundle, so future reports can populate the rule-attribution tables (Section 4).All reactions