[Outcome Report] Workflow Health Report — 2026-08-07

[github-actions]

Workflow Health — 2026-08-07

Executive read: Overall strong acceptance rate (86%) but 16 items stuck pending with no progress. Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer (🔴 stuck) has 7 pending items; Issue Monster is also stuck with 6 pending and no accepted outcomes. Test Quality Sentinel has unknown review outcomes that need assessment.

| Workflow | Status | Lifecycle health | References |
|---|---|---|
| Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer | 🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟩🟨🟥🟥🟩 | 🔴 stuck | 🟨 #50942 · 🟩 #50929 · 🟥 #50934 · 🟥 #50910 · 🟩 #50907 |
| Issue Monster | 🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 | 🔴 stuck | 🟨 #50760 · 🟨 #50759 · 🟨 #50797 |
| Impeccable Skills Reviewer | 🟨🟨⬜🟩⬜ | 🟡 in flight | ⬜ #50942 · 🟩 #50929 · ⬜ #50934 |
| Test Quality Sentinel | 🟩⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ | ⚪ underdefined | 🟩 #50942 · ⬜ #50942 · 🟩 #50929 · 🟩 #50929 · 🟩 #50934 · ⬜ #50934 |
| PR Sous Chef | 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨 | 🟡 in flight | 🟩 #50942 · 🟩 #50942 · 🟩 #50920 · 🟩 #50920 · 🟨 #50950 |
| Daily Sentrux Report | 🟩 | 🟢 resolving | 🟩 #50951 |
| Detection Analysis Report | 🟩 | 🟢 resolving | 🟩 #50949 |
| PR Description Updater | 🟩🟩 | 🟢 resolving | 🟩 #50924 · 🟩 #50929 |

Legend:

• Status: 🟩 accepted · 🟥 rejected · 🟨 pending · ⬜ unknown
• Lifecycle health: 🟢 resolving · 🟡 in flight · 🟠 aging · 🔴 stuck · ⚪ underdefined
• References: one linked item per status emoji, in the same order as the Status column

🔴 Action Items

1. Stuck workflows — Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer and Issue Monster both stuck with pending items for >8min and >7min respectively. Review why outputs aren't resolving; the workflows may need configuration changes or acceptance criteria clarification.

2. Unknown review outcomes — Test Quality Sentinel and Impeccable Skills Reviewer have 2 unknown outcomes each (submit_pull_request_review). These reviews need assessment to understand whether they're being engaged with or if the review lifecycle evaluation needs refinement.

3. High waste rate workflows — Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer has 50% waste rate (2 rejected, 2 accepted). Review the prompt or acceptance criteria; high dismissal rate suggests the output quality or targeting may be off.

4. Zero-touch rate — All accepted items required human action (zero-touch rate 0%). This is a data quality signal: the evaluator may not be capturing quiet wins (e.g., reviews that sit untouched but aren't dismissed). Consider refining evidence strength for submit_pull_request_review.

5. Ignored outcomes — Daily Sentrux Report and Detection Analysis Report generated discussions with no replies. These may be targeting or timing issues; validate the workflow output is reaching the intended audience.

Detailed metrics, evidence quality, workflow counts, and trends

Outcome Scorecard — 2026-08-07

Metric	Value	Status
Acceptance rate	86%	🟢
Zero-touch rate	0%	🔴
Waste rate	5%	🟢
Median time to resolution	1h	—
Accepted	13 / 37	—
— strong evidence	6	merged, completed, approved
— medium evidence	7	engaged, retained
— weak evidence	0	existence only
Rejected	2	—
Ignored	2	no observable follow-up
Zero-touch	0 / 13	—
Pending	16	—
Runs checked	17	—

Per-Workflow Breakdown

Workflow	Accepted	Rejected	Ignored	Pending	Unknown	Acceptance	Waste
Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer	2	2	0	7	0	50%	50%
Issue Monster	0	0	0	6	0	—	—
Impeccable Skills Reviewer	1	0	0	2	2	100%	0%
PR Sous Chef	4	0	0	1	0	100%	0%
Test Quality Sentinel	4	0	0	0	2	100%	0%
Daily Sentrux Report	0	0	1	0	0	—	—
Detection Analysis Report	0	0	1	0	0	—	—
PR Description Updater	2	0	0	0	0	100%	0%

📊 Measured by Outcome Collector · haiku45 · 16.7 AIC · ⌖ 2.58 AIC · ⊞ 7.4K

• expires on Aug 13, 2026, 5:17 PM UTC-08:00