Skip to content

[docs] docs: unbloat ResearchPlanAssignOps pattern doc - #50957

Merged
pelikhan merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/unbloat-research-plan-assign-ops-10a22ae8d70195bf
Aug 7, 2026
Merged

[docs] docs: unbloat ResearchPlanAssignOps pattern doc#50957
pelikhan merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/unbloat-research-plan-assign-ops-10a22ae8d70195bf

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actions github-actions Bot commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Condenses the ResearchPlanAssignOps pattern documentation (docs/src/content/docs/patterns/research-plan-assign-ops.md) for brevity, converting bulleted lists into flowing prose while preserving all information.

Changes

  • path: docs/src/content/docs/patterns/research-plan-assign-ops.md
  • change_type: modified (docs only, single file)
  • impact: low
  • breaking: false

Details:

  • End-to-End Example: Replaced the 3-bullet Monday/Tuesday timeline with a single narrative paragraph covering the same go-fan/plan → tracking issue → Copilot PR → review/merge flow.
  • Customization: Reworded the research-focus/frequency/report-format/assignment-method guidance into more natural prose (same options retained: static analysis, performance, docs quality, security, duplication, test coverage; daily/weekly/on-demand; discussions vs. issues; pre-assign/bulk-assign/manual).
  • When to Use: Converted the "fits when" and "prefer simpler pattern" bullet lists into two concise paragraphs, keeping inline links to IssueOps and MultiRepoOps and the assignees: copilot shortcut mention.
  • Limitations: Moved this section to follow "When to Use" (previously preceded it) and condensed its four separate points into one paragraph (slower than direct execution, needs review, requires clean phase handoffs, may need specialized MCPs like Serena/Tavily).

Verification

No code, configuration, or schema changes — documentation-only edit. No compile/test impact.> Generated by PR Description Updater for #50957 · auto · 36.5 AIC · ⊞ 6.8K ·

@github-actions github-actions Bot added automation doc-unbloat documentation Improvements or additions to documentation labels Aug 7, 2026
@pelikhan
pelikhan marked this pull request as ready for review August 7, 2026 02:23
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings August 7, 2026 02:23
@pelikhan
pelikhan merged commit 60e4db2 into main Aug 7, 2026
1 check passed
@pelikhan
pelikhan deleted the docs/unbloat-research-plan-assign-ops-10a22ae8d70195bf branch August 7, 2026 02:23
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

⚠️ Security scanning failed for Test Quality Sentinel. Review the logs for details.

No test files were added or modified in this PR. Test Quality Sentinel skipped. This PR only modifies documentation (docs/src/content/docs/patterns/research-plan-assign-ops.md).

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Condenses the ResearchPlanAssignOps documentation while retaining its structure and guidance.

Changes:

  • Replaces timeline bullets with prose.
  • Condenses usage, customization, and limitations guidance.
  • Reorders the limitations section.
Show a summary per file
File Description
docs/src/content/docs/patterns/research-plan-assign-ops.md Streamlines pattern guidance and examples.

Review details

Tip

Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

  • Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
  • Comments generated: 1
  • Review effort level: Balanced

- **Monday 7 AM** — `go-fan` posts a discussion *"[go-fan] Go Module Review: spf13/cobra"* recommending context propagation via cobra's `SetContext` and shared setup via `PersistentPreRunE`.
- **Monday afternoon** — A developer types `/plan` on the discussion. The planner opens a `[plan] cobra improvements` tracking issue with three sub-issues (context propagation, `PersistentPreRunE` refactor, cancellation tests), then assigns the first two to Copilot, which opens PRs within minutes.
- **Tuesday** — The developer reviews the PRs, requests one minor change, and merges both. The tracking issue closes automatically.
A typical `go-fan` cycle spans two days: Monday morning the workflow posts a discussion such as *"[go-fan] Go Module Review: spf13/cobra"* with recommendations like adopting `SetContext` and moving shared setup into `PersistentPreRunE`. That afternoon a developer runs `/plan`, which creates a `[plan] cobra improvements` tracking issue plus three sub-issues (context propagation, `PersistentPreRunE` refactor, and cancellation tests) and assigns the first two to Copilot. By Tuesday, the developer reviews the resulting PRs, requests any needed tweaks, and merges them; the tracking issue closes automatically once the sub-issues are resolved.
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🎉 This pull request is included in a new release.

Release: v0.86.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

automation doc-unbloat documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants