Skip to content

[squad] Implement #53520: Review prompt-generation safety and input handling - #53770

Closed
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
squad/implement-53520-wizard-security-review-97b44c465519e1cb
Closed

[squad] Implement #53520: Review prompt-generation safety and input handling#53770
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
squad/implement-53520-wizard-security-review-97b44c465519e1cb

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Focused security/design review (Kujan, Security Engineer) on user-supplied text flowing into generated wizard prompt content, client-side rendering, and the shared wizard JSON catalog's trust boundary, per issue #53520 (epic #53498).

Reviewed:

  • docs/src/components/Wizard.astro — free-text task description handling, prompt rendering
  • docs/src/lib/wizard/model.ts / validation.ts — shared JSON data model + validation
  • Existing test coverage (model.test.js, docs/tests/wizard.spec.ts)

Findings (new docs/security-review-wizard-prompt-generation.md)

  1. Low — Free-text task description is safely rendered (via textContent) but is a downstream prompt-integrity concern by design (user text flows verbatim into the generated prompt). No current length cap.
  2. Info — Client-side rendering consistently uses safe text sinks (textContent); no innerHTML/unsafe HTML sinks found in the wizard component.
  3. Mediumwizard-data-model.json is trusted static repo content today, but the spec anticipates future CLI/server reuse; the runtime validator does not enforce additionalProperties: false, ID uniqueness, referential integrity, or size limits needed once the model may come from less-trusted sources.
  4. Low — Current validateModel() is a shape validator for checked-in docs content, not a security boundary; needs strengthening before any external ingestion.

Includes a "Guardrails required before merge" checklist and a "Not in scope" section clarifying this is a hardening/documentation pass, not functional QA.

Validation

  • node docs/src/lib/wizard/model.test.js — 14/14 passed.
  • No production code changed; only the new review document was added.

Closes #53520

Generated by Squad Implement Worker · auto · 106.9 AIC · ⌖ 7.94 AIC · ⊞ 11K ·

Add this agentic workflow to your repo

To install this agentic workflow, run

gh aw add bradygaster/squad/workflows/squad-implement-worker.md@a70c752010f8adfb33f06c7aafb32db09aab1060
  • expires on Sep 1, 2026, 9:16 AM UTC-08:00

Documents risks and required guardrails for free-text task-description
handling, prompt rendering/escaping, and the shared wizard JSON model's
trust boundary for future reuse.

Closes #53520

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the squad label Aug 18, 2026
@pelikhan
pelikhan marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2026 17:19
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings August 18, 2026 17:19
@pelikhan pelikhan closed this Aug 18, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the closed:unknown PR was closed without merging: unknown label Aug 18, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Test Quality Sentinel completed test quality analysis.

No test files were added or modified in this PR. Test Quality Sentinel skipped. This PR only modifies documentation (docs/security-review-wizard-prompt-generation.md).

🧪 Test quality analysis by Test Quality Sentinel

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Documents a focused security review of wizard prompt generation, rendering safety, and future JSON model trust boundaries.

Changes:

  • Assesses free-text prompt-integrity risks and safe DOM rendering.
  • Documents validation gaps and future ingestion guardrails.
  • Adds a required-guardrails checklist.
Show a summary per file
File Description
docs/security-review-wizard-prompt-generation.md Records security findings and recommended mitigations.

Review details

💡 Add a code-review agent skill for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

  • Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
  • Comments generated: 2
  • Review effort level: Balanced

Comment on lines +81 to +86
## Guardrails required before merge

- [ ] Document that task-description text is untrusted user input, is copied verbatim into the generated prompt, and should not include secrets.
- [ ] Document that wizard-generated prompt text is plain text only and must not be rendered with `innerHTML`/unsafe HTML sinks without sanitization review.
- [ ] Document that `docs/src/data/wizard-data-model.json` is trusted static repo content in the docs implementation, but future CLI/server/plugin consumers must treat equivalent model JSON and `frontmatter` fragments as untrusted input.
- [ ] Add or track a reasonable maximum length for free-text task details before this ships broadly, to prevent oversized prompt output and reduce abuse potential.
Comment on lines +64 to +67
- Before merge, document that `docs/src/data/wizard-data-model.json` is trusted static repository content for the docs wizard only; future consumers must not assume equivalent JSON is trusted.
- Document that any CLI/server consumer loading model data from disk, network, or plugins must validate against the full JSON Schema, enforce size limits, and treat `frontmatter` fragments as untrusted structured data until merged under an allowlisted policy.
- Future generators should avoid prototype-polluting or surprising merge behavior when handling free-form objects such as `frontmatter`; prefer schema validation plus safe deep-merge logic that rejects dangerous keys and unknown top-level fields.
- Consider strengthening runtime validation in a follow-up hardening issue if/when the shared model is consumed outside the current checked-in docs path.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

closed:unknown PR was closed without merging: unknown squad

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Review prompt-generation safety and input handling

2 participants