Skip to content

Record blocked operational-value study for copilot-session-insights - #58541

Closed
mnkiefer with Copilot wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/operational-value-study-paper-v1-2c3e8cd4-dce7-4e34-9b74-f60c751a471a
Closed

Record blocked operational-value study for copilot-session-insights#58541
mnkiefer with Copilot wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/operational-value-study-paper-v1-2c3e8cd4-dce7-4e34-9b74-f60c751a471a

Conversation

Copilot AI commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Design and verify one deterministic operational-value grader for copilot-session-insights, per .github/skills/operational-value-designer/SKILL.md, as a fresh research run independent of any other workflow's contract.

Analysis

  • Recovered adoption-time intent from the workflow's first commit (12f94cc1c04e11c5331a0b9bd014cebe0a469122, 2025-10-31): a read-only analytics/reporting workflow whose only write action is publishing one Discussion summarizing Copilot coding-agent sessions.
  • Evaluated the later-added orphaned-branch escalation feature (25d123f3f0ac5c96be08c8fe1382d39107b86163, 2026-04-30) as a candidate opportunity — rejected because resolving a flagged branch is done by humans or other workflows, not this workflow itself, so it would misattribute a third party's action to this run.
  • Concluded no direct, deterministic primary metric in [0,1] is defensible without substituting activity (crediting a run for merely publishing a discussion), proxy attribution (crediting later third-party resolution of flagged branches), or agent judgment (assessing report/insight quality) — all disallowed by the contract.

Change

  • Added .github/graders/copilot-session-insights-operational-value-study.json with designOutcome: "blocked", a detailed rejectionReason, classification, decisions (intent/opportunity/evidence/metric with rejected alternatives and evidence references), and uncertainties.
  • No grader script, workflow markdown, or lock file changes — per the blocked-design path, only the study record is produced.
Original prompt

[operational-value-study:paper-v1] copilot-session-insights

Use the repository's .github/skills/operational-value-designer/SKILL.md to design
and verify one deterministic operational-value grader for github/gh-aw
workflow copilot-session-insights. This is a fresh research run; do not copy another
workflow's metric or contract.

Requirements:

  • Recover adoption-time intent and pre-adoption evidence independently.
  • Use exactly one direct primary attainment metric in [0,1]. Keep diagnostics separate.
  • Treat unavailable evidence as null, never zero. Make maturation explicit and stable.
  • Support historical assignment reconstruction when case and event are null.
  • If no direct operational metric is defensible, create only the study record below with designOutcome "blocked" and explain why. Never substitute activity, output volume, traces, or agent judgment.
  • Change only .github/workflows/copilot-session-insights.md, its generated lock file,
    .github/graders/copilot-session-insights-operational-value.sh, and .github/graders/copilot-session-insights-operational-value-study.json.
  • Do not add generated historical reports to the pull request.

Write .github/graders/copilot-session-insights-operational-value-study.json as JSON with this exact top-level shape:
{
"schemaVersion": 1,
"repository": "github/gh-aw",
"workflowId": "copilot-session-insights",
"recordedAt": "ISO-8601 timestamp",
"recorder": "copilot-coding-agent",
"designOutcome": "accepted|rejected|blocked",
"rejectionReason": null,
"classification": {
"domain": "short research domain",
"subdomain": null,
"taskArchetype": "short label",
"interventionType": "short label",
"outcomeType": "short label",
"evidenceDirectness": "direct|proxy|activity",
"evidenceLocality": "same-repository|cross-repository|external",
"measurementLevel": "nominal|ordinal|interval|ratio",
"metricForm": "binary|proportion|rate|distance-to-target|index",
"assignmentDeterminism": "deterministic|bounded-ambiguity|ambiguous",
"intentExplicitness": "explicit|implicit|mixed",
"markdownSpecificity": "exact|bounded|open-ended",
"outcomeObservability": "immediate|delayed",
"causalClaim": "observational|comparative-not-causal"
},
"decisions": [{
"type": "intent|opportunity|assignment|evidence|maturation|metric|baseline|diagnostic",
"selected": "observable selected design",
"alternatives": ["observable rejected alternative"],
"rationale": "concise evidence-backed rationale, not hidden reasoning",
"evidenceReferences": ["commit, issue, PR, or file reference"],
"changedDuringReview": false
}],
"uncertainties": [{
"type": "measurement|assignment|evidence-availability|temporal|baseline|domain-fit|causal-attribution",
"level": "low|medium|high|unknown",
"description": "specific limitation",
"mitigation": null,
"evidenceReferences": []
}]
}

For blocked/rejected designs, rejectionReason must be a non-empty string. Record
observable contract choices and alternatives only; do not record chain-of-thought.

Validation for accepted designs:

  1. .github/skills/operational-value-designer/scripts/verify-operational-value-evaluator.sh .github/graders/copilot-session-insights-operational-value.sh
  2. gh aw compile .github/workflows/copilot-session-insights.md

Keep the pull request limited to this workflow. The local study runner will replay
history and archive reports after this task completes.

Co-authored-by: mnkiefer <8320933+mnkiefer@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Design and verify deterministic operational-value grader for insights Record blocked operational-value study for copilot-session-insights Sep 4, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from mnkiefer September 4, 2026 15:11
@mnkiefer mnkiefer closed this Sep 4, 2026
@mnkiefer
mnkiefer deleted the copilot/operational-value-study-paper-v1-2c3e8cd4-dce7-4e34-9b74-f60c751a471a branch September 4, 2026 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants