Note: All top-5 workflows by AIC were optimized within the last 14 days. "Daily AI Poem" is selected as the least-recently optimized (9 days ago, 2026-07-01), making it the most eligible candidate under the 14-day exclusion rule.
Target Workflow
Daily AI Poem — posts a themed AI/developer poem as a GitHub Discussion daily at ~08:00 UTC.
- Workflow file:
.github/workflows/daily-ai-poem.md
- Selected because: highest AIC among workflows exceeding the 14-day exclusion window
- Analysis period: 7-day window ending 2026-07-10
Spend Profile
| Metric |
Value |
| Runs analyzed |
7 |
| Total AIC |
123.73 |
| Avg AIC / run |
17.68 |
| Total tokens (observed) |
48,974 (1 run with full data) |
| Avg tokens / run (est.) |
~7,000 |
| Avg turns / run |
2 |
| Conclusions |
7/7 success (100%) |
| Cache efficiency |
Not measured (single-run token sample) |
With only 2 turns per run, the workflow is already structurally lean. All spending flows through prompt size and model input overhead.
Ranked Recommendations
1. Compress Theme List to Inline Format
Estimated savings: ~1.5–2.0 AIC/run (8–12% prompt token reduction)
The theme section enumerates 7 bullet items with short prose descriptions, consuming ~90 tokens of input on every run. Collapsing these to a compact inline table removes the repetitive structure without losing any information.
Current (7 bullets × ~13 tokens each):
- **0**: AI agents and their curious habits
- **1**: The joy and pain of debugging
- **2**: Large language models trying to understand humans
- **3**: Pull requests, code reviews, and the art of "LGTM"
- **4**: Prompt engineering as a new form of poetry
- **5**: The future of developer tools and copilots
- **6**: Open-source community and the people who build it
Proposed (single inline line, ~30 tokens):
Themes (day-of-month mod 7): 0=AI agent habits · 1=debugging joy/pain · 2=LLMs vs humans · 3=PRs & LGTM culture · 4=prompt engineering · 5=dev tools & copilots · 6=open-source community
The mod-7 formula can also be pulled into the same line, removing the separate prose sentence introducing it.
Evidence: 7/7 runs observed, theme selection happens on every run, prompt tokens are the primary cost driver at 2 turns/run.
2. Tighten Instructions Section
Estimated savings: ~0.5–1.0 AIC/run (3–6% prompt token reduction)
The ## Instructions section contains four numbered steps. Steps 1 and 2 partially repeat the theme selection described above. Step 2's four sub-bullets can be compressed:
Current (~110 tokens):
1. Pick today's theme using the formula above (use today's date from the environment).
2. Write a poem of **3–4 stanzas** (4 lines each). It should:
- Have a clear voice — playful, clever, and warm
- Use concrete details (tool names, concepts, emojis welcome) to feel authentic
- Be funny or touching, not generic — a developer reading this should nod and smile
- Rhyming is encouraged but optional; rhythm matters more
3. Give the poem a punchy, memorable title (3–8 words).
4. Write a one-sentence "Inspiration Note" explaining what sparked today's theme.
Proposed (~70 tokens):
1. Select today's theme (theme index above).
2. Write 3–4 stanzas of 4 lines each: playful, clever, with concrete dev details (tool names, emojis ok). Rhythm over rhyme.
3. Give the poem a punchy title (3–8 words).
4. Add a one-sentence Inspiration Note.
Evidence: Instruction verbosity contributes to model input on every run with no differentiated output quality observed across runs.
3. Remove Redundant Output Format Caveat
Estimated savings: ~0.2–0.3 AIC/run (1–2% prompt token reduction)
The ## Output section ends with: "Keep it clean and emoji-tasteful. A developer should be able to share this on their team Slack without embarrassment. 🚀"
This duplicates guidance already implied by "playful, clever, and warm" and "a developer reading this should nod and smile" in Instructions. Removing it saves ~25 tokens per run.
Evidence: 7/7 successful runs produce clean, shareable content — the constraint is evidently well-understood without the reminder.
Combined Savings Estimate
| Recommendation |
Est. AIC savings/run |
Confidence |
| Compress theme list |
1.5–2.0 |
High |
| Tighten instructions |
0.5–1.0 |
Medium |
| Remove output caveat |
0.2–0.3 |
High |
| Total |
2.2–3.3 |
— |
At 7 runs/week, this equates to ~15–23 AIC/week in avoided spend.
Caveats
- Token data is available for only 1 of 7 runs; per-run token estimates are extrapolated from that sample.
- All savings estimates are based on input token reduction; output token count (the poem itself) is fixed by the 3–4 stanza constraint and unaffected.
- The workflow is already highly reliable (100% success, 2 turns/run) — no reliability improvements are warranted.
- No inline sub-agents are recommended: the entire workflow is a single creative generation task; sub-agents would add overhead with no parallelism benefit.
References: §29083082328
Generated by Agentic Workflow AIC Usage Optimizer · 117.7 AIC · ⊞ 21.6K · ◷
Target Workflow
Daily AI Poem — posts a themed AI/developer poem as a GitHub Discussion daily at ~08:00 UTC.
.github/workflows/daily-ai-poem.mdSpend Profile
With only 2 turns per run, the workflow is already structurally lean. All spending flows through prompt size and model input overhead.
Ranked Recommendations
1. Compress Theme List to Inline Format
Estimated savings: ~1.5–2.0 AIC/run (8–12% prompt token reduction)
The theme section enumerates 7 bullet items with short prose descriptions, consuming ~90 tokens of input on every run. Collapsing these to a compact inline table removes the repetitive structure without losing any information.
Current (7 bullets × ~13 tokens each):
Proposed (single inline line, ~30 tokens):
The mod-7 formula can also be pulled into the same line, removing the separate prose sentence introducing it.
Evidence: 7/7 runs observed, theme selection happens on every run, prompt tokens are the primary cost driver at 2 turns/run.
2. Tighten Instructions Section
Estimated savings: ~0.5–1.0 AIC/run (3–6% prompt token reduction)
The
## Instructionssection contains four numbered steps. Steps 1 and 2 partially repeat the theme selection described above. Step 2's four sub-bullets can be compressed:Current (~110 tokens):
Proposed (~70 tokens):
Evidence: Instruction verbosity contributes to model input on every run with no differentiated output quality observed across runs.
3. Remove Redundant Output Format Caveat
Estimated savings: ~0.2–0.3 AIC/run (1–2% prompt token reduction)
The
## Outputsection ends with: "Keep it clean and emoji-tasteful. A developer should be able to share this on their team Slack without embarrassment. 🚀"This duplicates guidance already implied by "playful, clever, and warm" and "a developer reading this should nod and smile" in Instructions. Removing it saves ~25 tokens per run.
Evidence: 7/7 successful runs produce clean, shareable content — the constraint is evidently well-understood without the reminder.
Combined Savings Estimate
At 7 runs/week, this equates to ~15–23 AIC/week in avoided spend.
Caveats
References: §29083082328