Nav page: drop an orphan footnote reference - #2754
Merged
Merged
Conversation
- [^add-external-link-via] shipped without its definition in google#2372, so readers see the raw marker; the sentence stands alone. Site-wide scan found no other orphan footnotes; markdownlint cannot catch this class (MD052 covers reference links/images only; footnotes are outside its rule vocabulary)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[^add-external-link-via]text on the Navigation page since [UG] Navigation page: switch to navbar & sidenav terminology, cleanup markdown #2372, which added the reference without its definition; the sentence reads fine without itPreview: https://deploy-preview-2754--docsydocs.netlify.app/docs/content/navigation/