Fix some oddities in Aarch64 TcmallocSlab::Pop(). - #599
Merged
Conversation
copybara-service
Bot
force-pushed
the
test_972527211
branch
from
September 1, 2026 07:31
a6b8b67 to
85d1772
Compare
We were prefetching the slab address we just loaded from, whereas what x86-64 does (and what makes sense) is to prefetch the _previous_ slab address. Also use LSL #2 instead of having a separate instruction (from outside the function) to shift the size class by 2. This was done for a brief period of time earlier, rolled back and then seemingly forgotten in the roll-forward. PiperOrigin-RevId: 974325235
copybara-service
Bot
force-pushed
the
test_972527211
branch
from
September 1, 2026 07:44
85d1772 to
634097b
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix some oddities in Aarch64 TcmallocSlab::Pop().
We were prefetching the slab address we just loaded from,
whereas what x86-64 does (and what makes sense) is to
prefetch the previous slab address.
Also use LSL #2 instead of having a separate instruction
(from outside the function) to shift the size class by 2.
This was done for a brief period of time earlier, rolled
back and then seemingly forgotten in the roll-forward.