Skip to content

fix: use pipeline instead of pipe#1906

Merged
pyphilia merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
pipeline
Jun 18, 2025
Merged

fix: use pipeline instead of pipe#1906
pyphilia merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
pipeline

Conversation

@pyphilia
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Documentation states it is better to use stream.pipeline() than .pipe(). It might definitely help for our memory usage issue. https://nodejs.org/en/learn/modules/how-to-use-streams#pipeline

A bigger change should be to remove the use of archiver to use yazl. This will be for a next PR, I guess built upon the queue.

@pyphilia pyphilia requested a review from spaenleh June 13, 2025 07:15
@pyphilia pyphilia self-assigned this Jun 13, 2025
@pyphilia pyphilia marked this pull request as ready for review June 16, 2025 15:09
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@spaenleh spaenleh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good !

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@pyphilia pyphilia added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 18, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 3e29d47 Jun 18, 2025
8 checks passed
@pyphilia pyphilia deleted the pipeline branch June 18, 2025 13:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants