Skip to content

Releases: grammy-jiang/research-pipeline

v0.28.0

07 Jun 04:59
v0.28.0
7e4872c

Choose a tag to compare

Added

  • architecture skill — Cross-Section Consistency Gate (skill manifest 0.9.0 → 1.0.0).
    Prevents downstream stages from discovering architecture gaps too late by adding
    a Cross-Section Consistency Pass inside architecture --mode design.

    • prompts/22_architecture_draft.md — adds step 2c: Cross-Section
      Consistency Pass verifying (i) every MVP operation in §23 exists in §12,
      (ii) every user-visible state in §23.3/§23.4 maps onto §14, (iii) every
      human-review action in §23.6 has a §12 contract + §14 transition + §16 audit
      event + §18 failure behaviour, (iv) every progress item in §23.4 has a §16
      observability event, (v) §24 handoffs reference only formalized or deferred
      operations. Gaps logged in §25 and §27.
    • prompts/23_quality_gate_self_check.md — adds five v0.9.0 cross-section
      consistency gates (20–24); updates Instructions to include them in the §26
      table.
    • templates/architecture_design_template.md — adds
      ### Cross-Section Consistency Gate sub-table to §26.
    • SKILL.md — adds quality gate 29.
    • manifest.json — bumped to 1.0.0.
  • ux-design skill — MVP phase and testability metadata (skill manifest 0.2.0 → 0.3.0).
    Enables implementation-plan to convert E2E seeds into concrete test tasks
    without guessing and to scope MVP-0 correctly.

    • prompts/07_user_stories.md — requires phase/release-gate header on
      every story (Phase, Primary Surface, Release Gate, Depends On); updates
      validation gate.
    • prompts/10_e2e_scenario_seeds.md — requires testability metadata block
      on every seed and a Testability Summary Table in §20; updates validation gate.
    • templates/e2e-scenario-template.md — adds testability metadata fields
      to skeleton and worked example.
    • templates/user-story-template.md — adds phase + release-gate fields;
      updates Rules.
    • prompts/13_quality_gate_self_check.md — adds six gate rows, five fail
      conditions, six warning conditions.
    • SKILL.md — adds quality gate 11.
    • manifest.json — bumped to 0.3.0.

v0.27.0

07 Jun 04:35
v0.27.0
db80e3c

Choose a tag to compare

Added

  • architecture skill — materialize mode (skill manifest 0.8.0 → 0.9.0).
    Adds architecture --mode materialize to consolidate the base architecture
    design plus all accepted update notes into one canonical implementation-ready
    source of truth before implementation-plan.
    • prompts/materialize_02_discover_and_order.md — discovers the base
      architecture by topic slug, discovers and validates accepted update notes
      (acceptance criteria: Artifact Type = architecture_update, quality-gate
      PASS, no unresolved blocking conflicts), sorts by version/update history,
      builds a section-level patch plan, flags preliminary conflicts.
    • prompts/materialize_03_apply_patches.md — checks six BLOCKING conflict
      classes (SECTION_CONFLICT, PATCH_TARGET_MISSING, TEXT_ANCHOR_GONE,
      CONTRACT_CONFLICT, SUPERSESSION_CONFLICT, BREAKING_CHANGE_UNRESOLVED); on
      any conflict writes a materialization-blocked report and stops; otherwise
      applies patches in order, removes resolved provisional wording, updates ADRs
      / open questions / handoffs.
    • prompts/materialize_04_final_document.md — produces the 30-section
      canonical architecture (27 original + Applied Updates + Superseded Patch
      Notes + Implementation-Plan Readiness), the artifact registry, and the
      open-question ledger; runs the Materialization Quality-Gate Self-Check.
    • templates/architecture_canonical_template.md — 30-section canonical
      architecture skeleton with Applied Updates, Superseded Patch Notes, and
      Implementation-Plan Readiness sections; Artifact Type = architecture_canonical.
    • templates/artifact_registry_template.md — artifact registry skeleton
      (Current Canonical Artifacts + Superseded / Historical Artifacts + Pipeline
      Stage Summary) telling downstream agents which files to read and which are
      audit history.
    • templates/open_question_ledger_template.md — open-question ledger
      skeleton centralizing all open questions with source, owner stage, blocking
      status, and required resolution action.
    • templates/materialization_blocked_template.md — blocked report skeleton
      emitted when a BLOCKING conflict prevents safe materialization.
    • references/materialization-guide.md — full guide: when to use, what it
      owns / must not own, accepted-update discovery rules, conflict classes, output
      files, quality-gate fail/warn conditions.
    • references/patch-manifest-guide.md — Patch Manifest YAML format guide
      and update-type taxonomy (NONE / NOTE_ONLY / ADR_ONLY / CONTRACT_PATCH /
      SECURITY_PATCH / OBSERVABILITY_PATCH / STRUCTURAL_PATCH / BREAKING_CHANGE).
    • references/artifact-registry-guide.md — artifact registry purpose,
      controlled status values, artifact role vocabulary, and rules.
    • references/open-question-ledger-guide.md — ledger purpose, ID prefix
      convention, status and owner-stage values, blocking-status values.
    • Mode resolver (prompts/00_mode_resolver.md) updated: adds materialize
      to the mode table and routing JSON; adds explicit materialize triggers and
      negative triggers; updates preconditions for six modes.
    • Mode-selection guide (references/mode-selection-guide.md) updated: adds
      materialize mode description, selection logic, negative triggers, and
      downstream flow showing full pipeline through materialize to
      implementation-plan.
  • architecture --mode update metadata improvements (skill manifest 0.8.0 → 0.9.0).
    Update mode output grows from 11 to 13 sections:
    • §5 Patch Manifest — machine-readable YAML consumed by materialize;
      every accepted decision maps to a patch entry with target section, operation,
      patch type, and implementation-blocking flag.
    • §12 Feedback Closure Matrix — tracks which downstream feedback items
      (ux-design Architecture Feedback, security-review findings) are resolved by
      which patches; NOT_APPLICABLE when no downstream feedback was applied.
    • Patch-Type Taxonomy added to Generation Metadata §1; multi-type allowed.
    • Skill version metadataUNKNOWN — resolver could not determine this value replaces bare unknown; quality gate warns on any UNKNOWN field.
    • prompts/update_02_apply_decisions.md and update_03_final_document.md
      updated to instruct producing §5, §12, and classified patch types.
    • references/architecture-update-guide.md updated with taxonomy table,
      Feedback Closure Matrix guidance, and 13-section quality gate.
    • SKILL.md updated: six-mode table, references table, materialize mode
      description, method section with materialize_tasks task graph.
    • manifest.json version 0.8.0 → 0.9.0; materialize_tasks task graph and
      materialize_mandatory_gates added; mode resolver routing updated.

v0.26.0

06 Jun 21:43
v0.26.0
8db20f1

Choose a tag to compare

Added

  • Cross-Skill Artifact Contract across the blueprint, architecture, and
    ux-design skills (blueprint skill 0.7.0 → 0.8.0, architecture 0.7.0 → 0.8.0,
    ux-design 0.1.0 → 0.2.0). A shared standard so every generated document is both
    a human report and a machine-readable handoff artifact, preventing pipeline
    drift / artifact mismatch / unstable topic slugs as the skill graph grows.
    • references/artifact-contract.md — the canonical contract (artifact-type
      registry, stable-topic-slug rules, filename rules, required Generation
      Metadata, Source/Resolved artifacts, decision register, assumptions, open
      questions, recommended next stage, quality-gate, controlled vocabulary,
      per-skill requirements). Skills install independently (each is symlinked to
      its own dir), so the file ships identically inside each of the three
      skills
      ; a guard test asserts the copies stay byte-identical.
    • Templates aligned (7): the blueprint, the five architecture mode
      templates (design / tech-stack / update / reconciliation / review), and the
      ux-design template now carry Artifact Type + stable Topic Slug metadata,
      an unnumbered ## Cross-Skill Artifact Contract block (Source Artifacts
      Consumed, Resolved Input Artifacts where discovery is used, and a Contract
      Field Map that points at each skill's existing decision/assumption/
      open-question/next-stage sections — alignment, not duplication), and a
      Cross-Skill Artifact Contract Gate in every self-check. No existing
      section numbering changed.
    • Prompts: the seven main generation / final-document prompts now instruct
      contract compliance with the controlled vocabulary; each SKILL.md References
      table lists artifact-contract.md.
    • Guard tests: tests/unit/test_artifact_contract.py enforces the contract
      structurally (templates include Generation Metadata / Topic Slug / Source
      Artifacts Consumed / Recommended Next Stage / Quality-Gate Self-Check; the
      five architecture mode templates include Resolved Input Artifacts; every
      self-check includes the contract gate; every skill references the contract;
      the contract file carries the registry + controlled vocabulary; the three
      copies are identical).
    • Worked examples are dated pre-contract snapshots and adopt the contract on
      next regeneration; implementation-plan / security-review / test-design
      will comply from day one.

v0.25.0

06 Jun 15:28
v0.25.0
833b6fb

Choose a tag to compare

Added

  • architecture skill — review / update / reconcile modes (skill
    manifest 0.6.0 → 0.7.0).
    The three remaining modes are now fully implemented
    (previously recognized-but-deferred), completing the architecture lifecycle:
    design → stack → update → ux-design → reconcile → review → implementation-plan.
    • Shared artifact resolver (prompts/resolve_artifacts.md,
      references/artifact-discovery-guide.md). When the user passes no filenames,
      all three modes auto-discover the most relevant prior skill/mode outputs from
      the working dir / docs / design / artifacts by topic slug + candidate
      scoring (filename suffix, section markers, recency), require the architecture
      design (STOP with a clear message if missing), ASK_USER on ambiguity, and
      embed a Resolved Input Artifacts table in every output.
    • review — evaluates architecture quality without changing it: a
      10-point score breakdown with justifications, blocking/warning/polish issue
      classification, readiness assessments, and recommended next actions →
      <topic-slug>-architecture-review.md (19 sections). It is the safe default
      when bare architecture is invoked and an architecture already exists.
    • update — applies already-accepted decisions (priority source: a
      tech-stack with Architecture Update Required? = Yes, then accepted
      reconciliation, security-review, newer blueprint, explicit user decision;
      never ux-design directly) into <topic-slug>-architecture-update.md (11
      sections) — an update note that does not overwrite the design document by
      default.
    • reconcile — turns downstream feedback (primarily a ux-design
      Architecture Feedback section) into findings, a missing-architecture-support
      map, a minimal patch plan, and an explicit Architecture Update Required?
      verdict + handoff to update<topic-slug>-architecture-reconciliation.md
      (11 sections). It does not patch the architecture by default and does not
      blindly accept a downstream artifact that contradicts the blueprint.
    • No-silent-mutation rule across all three modes; three new task graphs
      (review_tasks / update_tasks / reconcile_tasks) + mandatory gates; the
      mode resolver and mode-selection guide updated (bare architecture +
      existing architecture → review, never update); three templates, four
      references, three worked translation-system examples that chain off the
      existing stack (Architecture Update Required? = Yes) and ux-design
      (Architecture Feedback) examples; and Phase-5 guard tests.

Changed

  • AGENTS.md: the architecture skill is now described as five implemented
    modes
    .

v0.24.0

06 Jun 14:34
v0.24.0
2d4dbe5

Choose a tag to compare

Added

  • ux-design skill (new; skill manifest 0.1.0). The fifth bundled skill and
    the fourth stage of the design chain: research-pipeline → blueprint → architecture → ux-design → implementation-plan. It consumes an architecture
    design document (architecture --mode design output; the matching blueprint
    and tech-stack are optional) and emits <topic-slug>-ux-design.md. Pure
    prompt-driven (no CLI/MCP backend); auto-discovered by setup.
    • User-story-driven, not screen-drawing. It separates Skill Operator UX
      (how the user drives the skill workflow) from Target Software UX (how end
      users and agents interact with the product), and produces structured user
      stories (preconditions, main / alternative / failure-recovery flows,
      user-visible states resolving to the architecture state model, acceptance
      criteria), core journeys, surface-specific UX (only for
      architecture-supported surfaces), human-in-the-loop UX, error / empty /
      loading / degraded / recovery states, acceptance criteria, and Gherkin-style
      E2E scenario seeds (seeds, not executable tests).
    • Mandatory architecture feedback. §21 records UX-exposed architecture gaps
      (missing states / events / review schema / permissions) with severity and
      recommends architecture --mode reconcile when needed — the UX→architecture
      feedback loop.
    • Input discovery + fail-fast. Auto-discovers *-architecture-design.md in
      the working dir / docs / design / artifacts, ranks candidates, and
      STOPs with a clear message if none is found (it does not run from a blueprint
      alone). Hybrid is the default operating mode.
    • 22-section + Appendix-A output template, 13-task manifest, 13 prompts, 3
      templates, 4 references, a worked translation-system example, and structural
      tests (tests/unit/test_skill_ux_design.py).

Changed

  • architecture skill references updated to reflect that ux-design now
    exists (the mode-selection and Experience-Architecture guides no longer call it
    a "future skill not yet built"; no behavior change, architecture manifest stays
    0.6.0).
  • AGENTS.md: "Four skills" → "Five skills" with a ux-design row and description.

v0.23.0

06 Jun 13:31
v0.23.0
6804098

Choose a tag to compare

Changed

  • architecture skill — design/stack mode split (skill manifest 0.5.0 →
    0.6.0).
    Phase 1 of the architecture-skill mode-split improvement plan
    (docs/architecture-skill-mode-split-improvement-plan.md). The skill becomes
    one skill with internal modes instead of mixing architecture design and
    tech-stack selection in one pass. Tech/domain-neutral; the existing
    prompts/template/example are extended, not rewritten.
    • Mode resolver. A new prompts/00_mode_resolver.md + a ## Modes section
      in SKILL.md + references/mode-selection-guide.md select the mode (design
      / stack / update / review / reconcile) from an explicit mode
      argument or automatic detection. design and stack are fully specified;
      update reuses design mode's existing regenerate/patch/compare/adr-only/
      resume machinery; review/reconcile are recognized but deferred (never
      silently mutate an architecture).
    • design mode consumes blueprint §9 and §19. It now reads the blueprint's
      §9 Product Experience Direction into a new §23 Experience Architecture
      section (interaction surfaces, user-visible states mapped onto the §14 state
      model, feedback/progress, error/recovery, human-review flow, trust/
      transparency, UX handoff — architecture-level UX support, not UX design), and
      reflects the §19 Recommended Next Stages routing in a new §24 Recommended
      Next Stages and Downstream Handoffs
      section (tech-stack / ux-design /
      security-review / test-design handoffs + update/reconciliation triggers). The
      design output grows from 25 to 27 sections.
    • Provisional-tech discipline. §7 keeps the tech stack provisional with
      new §7.1 Provisional Tech Assumptions and §7.2 Tech-Stack Selection Handoff
      sub-sections whenever §19 routes tech-stack-selection = RUN/DEFER; final
      selection is owned by stack mode. Five new §26 self-check gates enforce
      this (Product Experience Direction consumed, Experience Architecture
      produced, Recommended Next Stages consumed, tech-stack-provisional, and
      downstream-handoffs-present).
    • stack mode. A separate 6-task graph (prompts/stack_01stack_06,
      templates/architecture_tech_stack_template.md,
      references/tech-stack-selection-guide.md) selects the concrete technology
      stack against the architecture — one decision per area with alternatives,
      rationale, risk, reversibility, and architecture impact — and ends with an
      explicit Architecture Update Required? verdict. It satisfies the
      architecture and never redesigns it; on a genuine conflict it declares the
      update instead of rewriting. Output: <topic-slug>-architecture-tech-stack.md.
    • A worked stack example (examples/translation_tech_stack_example.md) is
      added and the design example is updated to 27 sections.

v0.22.0

06 Jun 12:37
v0.22.0
42bf064

Choose a tag to compare

Changed

  • blueprint skill — adaptive next-stage routing clarity (skill manifest
    0.6.0 → 0.7.0).
    A focused follow-up to the §19 router and §9 Product
    Experience Direction, acting on an external review of a generated blueprint.
    No redesign — the changes are columns, a couple of small tables, and a short
    rationale, all tech/domain-neutral and folded into the existing
    prompts/templates/reference/example:
    • §19.2 Depends On column. The Stage Recommendations table now states
      each stage's prerequisite explicitly (e.g. security-review and ux-design
      depend on architecture-design), distinct from the revisit trigger, so the
      pipeline no longer looks more rigid — or more parallel — than intended.
    • §19.4 Recommended Pipeline split. The single flat pipeline list is now a
      Recommended Linear Path (core ordered sequence) plus a Conditional
      Follow-up Gates
      table (Gate | Run When | Typical Input | Output), so
      deferred conditional stages — chiefly architecture-update /
      architecture-reconciliation — are never silently dropped from the routing
      picture.
    • §19.3 ASK_USER Decision Rationale. When no stage is ASK_USER, §19 now
      justifies why (each high-impact unknown is already answered by the source
      report / §9, deferred to architecture-design, or delegated to
      security-review, with a named owner) instead of looking over-confident;
      FAIL if ASK_USER is absent despite an unresolved high-impact unknown with
      no downstream owner.
    • §19.1 complexity score labelled a routing heuristic. The output now
      states that the / 21 score is a routing heuristic, not a formal project
      estimate, to be revisited after architecture-design — preventing false
      precision.
    • §9.4 / §9.5 interaction-mode Classification. Every interaction mode now
      carries a controlled classification — primary surface / secondary
      surface
      / wrapper / integration surface / future surface — with an
      explicit rule that "AI Skill" must be disambiguated (usually a
      wrapper/integration surface around the CLI/core, not a separate runtime) and
      never conflated with MCP (a tool surface for external AI agents).
    • Quality gates. The Product Experience Gate gains an "Interaction modes
      classified" row; the Adaptive Stage-Gate Recommendation Gate gains
      "Stage table has Depends On", "Linear-path vs conditional-gates split",
      "ASK_USER absence explained", and "Complexity score labelled heuristic" rows,
      plus matching WARNING conditions. The §19 output-discipline budget was
      updated so the additions (columns + small tables) do not contradict the
      "keep §19 compact" rule.

v0.21.0

06 Jun 11:13
v0.21.0
571c358

Choose a tag to compare

Added

  • blueprint skill — Recommended Next Stages (adaptive stage-gate routing;
    skill manifest 0.5.0 → 0.6.0).
    The blueprint is now the first adaptive
    stage-gate router
    after research extraction: instead of leaving every
    optional downstream stage to manual choice, it evaluates the project and
    recommends which stages should run next — with evidence, confidence, and
    revisit triggers — without silently expanding the pipeline. Folded into the
    existing prompts/templates/example (no new manifest tasks),
    tech/domain-neutral:
    • New §19 Recommended Next Stages (the output template grows from 19 to 20
      sections; §19 sits after the technical-design handoff and before the
      Traceability Appendix, which renumbers to §20). It contains a Pipeline
      Complexity Assessment
      (seven 0–3 dimensions — user-facing complexity,
      technical ambiguity, security/privacy risk, AI/LLM uncertainty, integration
      complexity, human-review complexity, testing/E2E importance — with a total
      / 21 and a simple/lightweight/medium/complex workflow class), a Stage
      Recommendations
      table covering architecture-design, tech-stack-selection,
      ux-design, security-review, test-design, architecture-update, and
      architecture-reconciliation, a short Recommended Pipeline, and a
      Stage-Gate Decision Log.
    • Controlled decision vocabulary — every stage uses exactly one of
      RUN / SKIP / DEFER / ASK_USER (no vague "maybe / consider / nice to
      have"). Every RUN/ASK_USER needs evidence, every SKIP a reason, every DEFER
      a revisit trigger; recommendations are overrideable defaults.
      architecture-design is normally RUN; architecture-update and
      architecture-reconciliation default to DEFER at blueprint stage (no
      architecture document exists yet).
    • Adaptive Stage-Gate Recommendation Gate added to the quality-gate prompt
      (Gate 9) and the Appendix A self-check (seven rows: section exists,
      controlled decisions, RUN evidence, SKIP reason, DEFER revisit trigger,
      ASK_USER missing-info, and Product Experience Direction informs the
      recommendations), with explicit FAIL and WARNING conditions.
    • Product Experience Direction integration — §9 signals drive the routing
      (human review → ux-design / test-design; external egress → security-review;
      CLI-first → ux-design DEFER; future MCP → tech-stack-selection RUN/DEFER),
      making §9 actionable rather than decorative.
    • New reference references/adaptive-stage-gate-routing.md — the decision
      vocabulary, per-stage RUN/SKIP/DEFER/ASK_USER rules, complexity scoring, the
      PED-integration table, the output-discipline budget, and the gate
      definition. SKILL.md, prompts 04/05, the template, the example, and both
      checklists were updated; the shipped example models a realistic 16/21
      "complex" routing recommendation.

Changed

  • blueprint SKILL.md now documents 20 sections, adds adaptive-routing trigger
    phrases ("what should we build next?", "which design stages should we run
    next?"), and a ninth quality gate.

v0.20.0

06 Jun 05:08
4dc1133

Choose a tag to compare

Added

  • blueprint skill — Product Experience Direction (lightweight UX-intent
    support; skill manifest 0.4.0 → 0.5.0).
    The blueprint now captures enough
    product-experience direction to keep downstream architecture and
    implementation from inventing UX assumptions, without turning blueprint into a
    full UX-design stage. The boundary is explicit: blueprint defines UX intent
    · architecture defines the UX-enabling technical structure · a later UX-design
    skill defines the detailed experience · implementation-plan turns it into
    build tasks.
    Folded into the existing prompts/templates/example (no new
    manifest tasks), tech/domain-neutral:
    • New §9 Product Experience Direction (the output template grows from 18
      to 19 sections; §9 sits after Workflow Model and before Logical
      Architecture, so UX intent exists before the architecture handoff). It
      captures, compactly (1–2 pages, tables): Primary Experience Thesis · Primary
      User / Operator · Primary Job-to-Be-Done · Primary Interaction Mode
      (CLI/Web/GUI/TUI/API/AI-Skill/MCP/Hybrid, with MVP stage + rationale) ·
      Secondary / Future Interaction Modes · Critical Trust, Control, and
      Transparency Requirements · Human-in-the-Loop Experience · Failure and
      Recovery Expectations · UX Assumptions for Architecture · Product Experience
      Handoff to Architecture.
    • Product Experience Gate added to the quality-gate prompt and the
      Appendix A self-check (eight rows: primary user, job-to-be-done, experience
      thesis, interaction mode, trust/control/transparency, human-in-the-loop,
      failure/recovery, UX handoff), with explicit FAIL and WARNING conditions.
    • UX-intent boundary enforced — §9 must not contain screen layout,
      wireframes, CSS/visual design, full user journeys, exact CLI syntax/flags,
      exact MCP/API schemas, copywriting, mobile navigation, full accessibility
      checklists, or implementation tasks (UX over-reach is a gate FAIL). SKILL.md
      gains UX trigger phrases and negative triggers (detailed UI/UX → a later
      UX-design skill); the forbidden-content checklist gains a detailed-UX
      section.
    • New reference references/product-experience-direction.md — the section
      template, the boundary rule, the grill-me-style clarification-question
      format (good vs. bad questions), the Product Experience Gate, and the output
      budget.
    • Chain handoff — the architecture skill's blueprint-parse prompt now
      extracts product_experience (interaction mode, trust/control/transparency,
      human-in-the-loop, failure/recovery, UX assumptions) so it preserves UX
      intent instead of inventing it.
    • Updates the manifest, SKILL.md, prompt 04 (generate), prompt 05
      (quality-gate), the output template, both test checklists, and the worked
      example (now modelling §9 + a PASS-with-warning PE-gate row), with new guard
      tests including a Copilot description-length check.

v0.19.5

05 Jun 09:17
a14aedc

Choose a tag to compare

�[38;2;0;136;0;03m## Changed�[39;00m

�[38;2;102;102;102m�[39marchitecture�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mskill�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m—�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mprovenance�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m&�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39moutput�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39mdiscipline�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mhardening�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mpass�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m(skill�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mmanifest�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m0.4�[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m.0�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m→�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m0.5�[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m.0�[39m).�[38;2;102;102;102m�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mFourth�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mreview�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39mdriven�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mpass.�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mThe�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mreviewed�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mdocument�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mwas�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mconfirmed�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mgenerated�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mby�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mv0�[38;2;102;102;102m.19�[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m.4�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m(metadata�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mreports�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mskill�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m0.4�[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m.0�[39m)�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mand�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mthe�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mv0�[38;2;102;102;102m.19�[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m.4�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mfixes�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mverified�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mas�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mlanded�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m(�[38;2;170;34;255;01mdata�[39;00m�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39megress�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m+�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mverification�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mtable�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m§17�[38;2;102;102;102m.12�[39m,�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mzero�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39munchecked�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mcheckboxes).�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mFive�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mtargeted�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39madditions,�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mfolded�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01minto�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mexisting�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mprompts�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m+�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mself�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mcheck�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m(�[38;2;170;34;255;01mno�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mnew�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mmanifest�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mtasks),�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mtech�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39mneutral�[38;2;102;102;102m:�[39m

�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m�[39mDecision�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mevidence�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m/�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mprovenance�[38;2;102;102;102m�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m—�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mhigh�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39mimpact�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m§3�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mdecisions�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mcarry�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39ma�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mDecision�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mEvidence�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mvalue�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mand�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mare�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mnever�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mlabelled�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39muser-confirmed�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mwithout�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39man�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mexplicit�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01msource�[39;00m;�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39munclear�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mprovenance�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mdowngrades�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mto�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39marchitecture_assumption�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m+�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mreview.
�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m�[39mRaw�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01msource�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mcontent�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mforbidden�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01min�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mlogs�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mby�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mdefault�[39;00m�[38;2;102;102;102m�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mfor�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mexternal�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39mmodel�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39msystems�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m—�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mredaction�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m+�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mlog�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01msnapshot�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m+�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mprovider�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mwrapper�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mtests�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mas�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39ma�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mrelease�[39;00m�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39mblocking�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m§17�[38;2;102;102;102m.12�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mgate�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m(operator�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mconfig�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39malone�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39minsufficient).
�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m�[39mWarning�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39msurfacing�[38;2;102;102;102m�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m—�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mevery�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m§24�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mWARNING�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m/�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mPASS�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mwith�[39;00m�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39mwarning�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mrow�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mis�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mechoed�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01minto�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m§1�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m(�[38;2;170;34;255;01mnew�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m§1�[38;2;102;102;102m.2�[39m)�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mand�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m§25�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mwith�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mits�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mrequired�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01maction�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mand�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mblocking�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mstatus�[39;00m.
�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m�[39mStricter�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mstandard�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39moutput�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mbudget�[38;2;102;102;102m�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mwith�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mconcrete�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mtargets.
�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m�[39mBuild�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39msequencing�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mcap�[38;2;102;102;102m�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m—�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m§25�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m≤�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;102;102;102m5�[39m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mhigh�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mlevel�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mconstraints;�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mno�[39;00m�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mfile�[39;00m�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mby�[39;00m�[38;2;102;102;102m-�[39m�[38;2;170;34;255;01mfile�[39;00m�[38;2;102;102;102m/�[39mtickets�[38;2;102;102;102m/�[39mPR�[38;2;102;102;102m/�[39mmigration�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mordering.

The�[38;2;187;187;187m �[39mreview�[38;2;187;68;68m'�[39m�[38;2;187;68;68ms lower-priority items were already shipped in v0.19.3/v0.19.4 and were not re-implemented. The worked example now models a realistic PASS-with-warning and surfaces it. See CHANGELOG.�[39m