feat!: remove implicit agent writes and retired surfaces - #75
Conversation
BREAKING CHANGE: Hack no longer exposes Tickets, hosted migration stubs, legacy dispatch PR flags, or automatic agent-integration mutation from ordinary commands, update, and doctor repair.
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
@codex review |
|
Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: d8a6630ac0
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 8d9e2ce401
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e8f97aef6c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 1807130d37
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 5279022eb3
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Line 322 in c1672b2
Add the retained cache to generated agent guidance
Fresh evidence after the earlier durable-docs fix is that this restored tickets/ entry is still omitted from the canonical managed-files bullet in src/agents/instruction-source.ts, and therefore from the rendered AGENTS, Codex-skill, and Cursor surfaces. For upgraded projects with this legacy cache, those generated instructions inaccurately enumerate the managed ignore set without the retained path; update the instruction source and regenerate the agent surfaces so the documented contract matches this template.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L58-L60
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
|
Addressed the latest Codex review in b007cb4. The canonical managed-files guidance now documents the retained tickets cache path as upgrade-only safety, the integration content revision is refreshed, and AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, Cursor rules, and the Codex skill were regenerated. Project sync check and the guidance/revision tests pass. |
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b007cb47ad
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: a9266db12e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
|
@codex review |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 0cef615d9b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
|
Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
## Summary - pin a Conventional Commits preset compatible with semantic-release 25 - add a regression proving the repository release config classifies `feat!:` as a major release ## Why Release Prepare passed after PR #75 merged but emitted “no release” because the transitive preset exposed the legacy configuration shape. The unreleased breaking commit remains on `main`; once this fix lands, semantic-release will analyze both commits and publish the intended v4 release. ## Verification - `bun test tests/release-config.test.ts` - `bunx tsc -p packages/cli/tsconfig.json --noEmit` - `bun run check` - `bun x ultracite check` - `git diff --check` ## Release decision Yes. This is a release-pipeline fix and should carry a patch signal; combined with the still-unreleased `feat!:` commit from PR #75, the next Release Prepare run must produce the intended major release. <!-- codesmith:footer --> --- <a href="https://app.blacksmith.sh/hack-dance/codesmith/hack/pr/76"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/view-with-codesmith-dark-v2.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/view-with-codesmith-light-v2.svg"><img alt="View with [code]smith" src="https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/view-with-codesmith-dark-v2.svg"></picture></a> <a href="https://backend.blacksmith.sh/track/enable-autofix?expires=1790949782&installation_model_id=17053&pr_number=76&repository=hack-dance%2Fhack&return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fhack-dance%2Fhack%2Fpull%2F76&signature=3c60cfc0d70a00d7cc42448aff658b4b1501072169ae9ae43c1c07545094d3ca"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/autofix-with-codesmith-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/autofix-with-codesmith-light.svg"><img alt="Autofix with [code]smith" src="https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/autofix-with-codesmith-dark.svg"></picture></a> <sup>Need help on this PR? Tag <code>@codesmith-bot</code> with what you need. Autofix is disabled.</sup> <!-- codesmith:autofix:disabled --> <!-- /codesmith:footer -->
## Summary - pin `conventional-changelog-conventionalcommits` 8.0.0, compatible with semantic-release 25 and changelog-writer 8.2 - extend the release regression through both major-version analysis and rendered breaking-change notes ## Why Release Prepare correctly selected v4.0.0 after PR #76, but preset 10 requires changelog-writer 9+ and failed during note generation. Preset 8 provides the current config API without exceeding the writer version bundled by semantic-release 25. ## Verification - `bun test tests/release-config.test.ts` - `bun run check` - `bunx tsc -p packages/cli/tsconfig.json --noEmit` - `git diff --check` ## Release decision Yes. This release-pipeline correction should carry a patch signal. The unreleased breaking commit from PR #75 remains in the semantic-release range, so the next successful run should publish v4.0.0. <!-- codesmith:footer --> --- <a href="https://app.blacksmith.sh/hack-dance/codesmith/hack/pr/77"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/view-with-codesmith-dark-v2.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/view-with-codesmith-light-v2.svg"><img alt="View with [code]smith" src="https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/view-with-codesmith-dark-v2.svg"></picture></a> <a href="https://backend.blacksmith.sh/track/enable-autofix?expires=1790950695&installation_model_id=17053&pr_number=77&repository=hack-dance%2Fhack&return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fhack-dance%2Fhack%2Fpull%2F77&signature=fef90926c64f91c3afa81b421781288e8c13fdd9725aefd62c50883b7198812e"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/autofix-with-codesmith-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/autofix-with-codesmith-light.svg"><img alt="Autofix with [code]smith" src="https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/autofix-with-codesmith-dark.svg"></picture></a> <sup>Need help on this PR? Tag <code>@codesmith-bot</code> with what you need. Autofix is disabled.</sup> <!-- codesmith:autofix:disabled --> <!-- /codesmith:footer -->
![https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/view-with-codesmith-dark-v2.svg"><source](https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/view-with-codesmith-dark-v2.svg"><source){kind=link}
![https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/view-with-codesmith-light-v2.svg"><img](https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/view-with-codesmith-light-v2.svg"><img){kind=link}
![https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/view-with-codesmith-dark-v2.svg"></picture></a](https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/view-with-codesmith-dark-v2.svg"></picture></a){kind=link}
![https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/autofix-with-codesmith-dark.svg"><source](https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/autofix-with-codesmith-dark.svg"><source){kind=link}
![https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/autofix-with-codesmith-light.svg"><img](https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/autofix-with-codesmith-light.svg"><img){kind=link}
![https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/autofix-with-codesmith-dark.svg"></picture></a](https://pr-comments-assets.blacksmith.sh/codesmith/autofix-with-codesmith-dark.svg"></picture></a){kind=link}
## [4.0.0](v3.5.2...v4.0.0) (2026-09-02) ### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES * remove implicit agent writes and retired surfaces ### Features * remove implicit agent writes and retired surfaces ([bb10f99](bb10f99)) ### Bug Fixes * **release:** recognize bang breaking markers ([8db8742](8db8742)), closes [#75](#75) [#75](#75) * **release:** use compatible changelog preset ([f211223](f211223)), closes [#76](#76) [#75](#75)
1 participant
Summary
Release decision
Yes. This intentionally carries a breaking/major release signal because deprecated CLI surfaces are removed and automatic agent-integration repair is replaced by explicit setup sync commands.
Verification
bun run checkbun run typecheckbun run buildbun tests/e2e/run.ts --only=agent-docs-syncbun index.ts setup sync --all-scopes --checkreports all project and global integrations currentgit diff --checkThe monolithic
bun testinvocation is not claimed as an acceptance signal: in this environment unrelated suites share process/global TLS state and the real-home registry lock. The affected suites and the explicit end-to-end boundary were run independently and pass.Need help on this PR? Tag
@codesmith-botwith what you need. Autofix is disabled.