stacks: allow multiple removed blocks to target the same component #36693
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
liamcervante
added
the
no-changelog-needed
dsa0x
approved these changes
Mar 14, 2025
DanielMSchmidt
approved these changes
Mar 14, 2025
Contributor
|
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR updates the stacks config and runtime to allow multiple removed blocks to target the same component. Essentially, all of our tracking of removed blocks have changed from
map[string]*Removedtomap[string][]*Removedwith some post processing logic to flatten the returned instances.There is an update in the stack configuration components API to reflect this, so I have deprecated the old fields in the proto files and added a new repeated field that contains the repeated fields.