Skip to content

FE-698: Design/spec/plan augmentation#103

Merged
lunelson merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
ln/fe-698-slice-c
May 8, 2026
Merged

FE-698: Design/spec/plan augmentation#103
lunelson merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
ln/fe-698-slice-c

Conversation

@lunelson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lunelson lunelson commented May 7, 2026

Stack Context

This FE-698 stack establishes the prompt/context scenario substrate and clarifies the adjacent semantic and agent-harness roadmap it unlocks.

What?

  • Adds design docs for intent graph semantics, behavioral kernels, deferred reconciliations, and dev workflow evolution.
  • Reconciles memory/SPEC.md / memory/PLAN.md with the expanded ontology, progressive checkability, behavioral-kernel, and agent mutation-surface direction.
  • Clarifies that future agent-originated writes must route through Brunch-owned mutation handlers rather than direct ORM access.

Why?

The prompt/context substrate sits between current observer/interviewer code and several future agent capabilities. This PR captures the design context needed to sequence those next frontiers without mixing product ontology, dev workflow, and harness-adapter authority.

@lunelson lunelson changed the title spec/plan/docs augmentation, pass 1 FE-698: Prompt/context substrate planning 2 May 7, 2026
@lunelson lunelson marked this pull request as ready for review May 7, 2026 15:44
@cursor
Copy link
Copy Markdown

cursor Bot commented May 7, 2026

PR Summary

Low Risk
Primarily documentation and roadmap/spec updates with no runtime code changes; risk is limited to alignment/interpretation issues that could affect future implementation planning.

Overview
Adds new canonical design references for upcoming intent-spec work: INTENT_GRAPH_SEMANTICS.md (typed claim kinds/subtypes, edge metadata, relation-policy registry, and progressive-checkability ladder) and BEHAVIORAL_KERNELS.md (kernel taxonomy, signal routing, kernel-card structure, and contrastive-question workflow for FE-702 probes).

Introduces DEV_WORKFLOW_EVOLUTION.md to explicitly separate dev-layer workflow/registry ideas from product-layer ontology, plus DEFERRED_RECONCILIATIONS.md as a trigger-based backlog for future SPEC/PLAN promotions.

Updates memory/PLAN.md and memory/SPEC.md to reference these docs, expand FE-698/FE-700/FE-702 recommended shapes, and add a new requirement/lexicon direction that agent-originated writes must go through a Brunch-owned typed mutation surface (no direct ORM mutations via harnesses/adapters).

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 3f5a1fc. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@lunelson lunelson self-assigned this May 7, 2026
@lunelson lunelson requested a review from kostandinang May 7, 2026 15:45
@augmentcode
Copy link
Copy Markdown

augmentcode Bot commented May 7, 2026

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: This PR expands the intent‑spec synthesis into focused canonical design references and updates the plan/spec to point at them.

Changes:

  • Adds docs/design/INTENT_GRAPH_SEMANTICS.md defining the product‑layer intent‑graph ontology (kinds/subtypes), relation taxonomy, edge metadata, relation‑policy registry, and progressive‑checkability binding.
  • Adds docs/design/BEHAVIORAL_KERNELS.md defining a v0.1 behavioral‑kernel taxonomy, signal‑phrase routing, kernel cards, contrastive question patterns, and the kernel‑driven interviewer workflow.
  • Adds docs/design/DEV_WORKFLOW_EVOLUTION.md capturing the dev‑layer ln-* workflow, pressure points in markdown‑mediated SPEC/PLAN, and a proposed file‑backed spec registry trajectory (with a convergence discussion).
  • Adds docs/design/DEFERRED_RECONCILIATIONS.md as an interim backlog of SPEC/PLAN/doc promotions gated by explicit trigger conditions.
  • Updates docs/design/README.md and memory/PLAN.md to reference the new docs and refine FE‑698/FE‑700/FE‑702 “Recommended shape” guidance.
  • Updates memory/SPEC.md with an explicit dev‑vs‑product layer note, a new requirement around a single Brunch‑owned agent mutation surface, a supporting decision, and related lexicon entries.

Technical Notes: The changes formalize “typed claims + typed edges + witness strength” as the substrate for upcoming kernel probes, topology‑driven question ranking, and scenario‑runner prompt experiments.

🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@augmentcode augmentcode Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review completed. 1 suggestion posted.

Fix All in Augment

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

Comment thread docs/design/INTENT_GRAPH_SEMANTICS.md Outdated
@lunelson lunelson changed the title FE-698: Prompt/context substrate planning 2 FE-698: Design/spec/plan augmentation May 7, 2026
@lunelson lunelson force-pushed the ln/fe-698-slice-c branch from 396d945 to d138c56 Compare May 7, 2026 16:41
@lunelson lunelson force-pushed the ln/fe-698-slice-b branch from 2acbcb3 to c99d056 Compare May 7, 2026 16:41
kostandinang
kostandinang previously approved these changes May 8, 2026
@graphite-app graphite-app Bot changed the base branch from ln/fe-698-slice-b to graphite-base/103 May 8, 2026 10:45
lunelson added 3 commits May 8, 2026 13:01
Signed-off-by: Lu Nelson <ln@hash.ai>
Signed-off-by: Lu Nelson <ln@hash.ai>
@lunelson lunelson force-pushed the graphite-base/103 branch from c99d056 to f1f4ad2 Compare May 8, 2026 11:02
@lunelson lunelson force-pushed the ln/fe-698-slice-c branch from d138c56 to 3f5a1fc Compare May 8, 2026 11:02
@lunelson lunelson changed the base branch from graphite-base/103 to main May 8, 2026 11:02
@github-actions github-actions Bot dismissed kostandinang’s stale review May 8, 2026 11:02

Latest approval commit d138c56 is not an ancestor of 3f5a1fc, indicating rewritten history after approval

@graphite-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

graphite-app Bot commented May 8, 2026

Merge activity

  • May 8, 11:02 AM UTC: Graphite rebased this pull request, because this pull request is set to merge when ready.

@kostandinang kostandinang self-requested a review May 8, 2026 11:03
@lunelson lunelson added this pull request to the merge queue May 8, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 02d37bc May 8, 2026
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants