Update Rust crate oxc to 0.111.0

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
oxc (source)	workspace.dependencies	minor	0.95.0 -> 0.111.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[hash-worker]

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

• any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
• the branch becomes conflicted, or
• you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
• you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: Cargo.lock

Command failed: cargo update --config net.git-fetch-with-cli=true --manifest-path Cargo.toml --package oxc@0.95.0 --precise 0.111.0
info: syncing channel updates for 'nightly-2026-01-19-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu'
info: latest update on 2026-01-19, rust version 1.95.0-nightly (0a3cd3b6b 2026-01-18)
info: downloading component 'cargo'
info: downloading component 'clippy'
info: downloading component 'llvm-tools'
info: downloading component 'miri'
info: downloading component 'rust-analyzer'
info: downloading component 'rust-src'
info: downloading component 'rust-std'
info: downloading component 'rustc'
info: downloading component 'rustc-codegen-cranelift'
info: downloading component 'rustfmt'
info: installing component 'cargo'
info: installing component 'clippy'
info: installing component 'llvm-tools'
info: installing component 'miri'
info: installing component 'rust-analyzer'
info: installing component 'rust-src'
info: installing component 'rust-std'
info: installing component 'rustc'
info: installing component 'rustc-codegen-cranelift'
info: installing component 'rustfmt'
    Updating git repository `https://github.com/hashdeps/oxc`
From https://github.com/hashdeps/oxc
 * [new branch]          dependabot/npm_and_yarn/tasks/e2e/preact-10.27.3 -> origin/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/tasks/e2e/preact-10.27.3
 * [new branch]          main       -> origin/main
 * [new ref]             HEAD       -> origin/HEAD
error: Unable to update https://github.com/hashdeps/oxc?rev=73c781b#0.111.0

Caused by:
  revspec '0.111.0' not found; class=Reference (4); code=NotFound (-3)

[cursor]

PR Summary

Updates dependency version only.

• Bumps oxc in Cargo.toml from 0.95.0 to 0.111.0

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit c0a31f7. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Review	Updated (UTC)
ds-theme	Error		Jan 26, 2026 1:30pm
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jan 26, 2026 1:30pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jan 26, 2026 1:30pm

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will create unknown performance changes

⏩ 18 skipped benchmarks¹
🗄️ 12 archived benchmarks run²

---

_{Comparing deps/rs/oxlint-monorepo (c0a31f7) with main (9125fd4)³}

Footnotes

1. 18 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

2. 12 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them. ↩

3. No successful run was found on main (34af2cd) during the generation of this report, so 9125fd4 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with Cloud Agents, enable Autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$25.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 191 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.102 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.264 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$11.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.178 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.694 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.045 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 143 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.854 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$26.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 151 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-38.719 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-81.853 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-60.369 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.259 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.205 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.957 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.467 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.536 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.748 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.194 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.522 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.321 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.738 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.630 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$39.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 168 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.015 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$75.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 419 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.602 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$43.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 190 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.946 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$46.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 310 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.402 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$54.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 368 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-12.632 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$40.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 171 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.764 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$410 \mathrm{ms} \pm 939 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.272 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$94.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 531 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.530 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$83.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 357 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.324 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$278 \mathrm{ms} \pm 814 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-12.114 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.965 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.461 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.836 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.963 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$17.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.481 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.561 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.914 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.453 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.712 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 156 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.650 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$29.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 236 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.109 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$29.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.423 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 256 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.078 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$29.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.001 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$30.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 273 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.461 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$29.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.262 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$28.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 241 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.462 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$29.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 261 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.452 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$28.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.071 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.497 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$47.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 203 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.276 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$93.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.011 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$52.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 319 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.171 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$59.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 356 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.631 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$68.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 294 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.176 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$74.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 457 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.291 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$51.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 361 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.664 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$79.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 440 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.330 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$56.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.704 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 314 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.436 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 288 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.891 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$67.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 369 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.850 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$141 \mathrm{ms} \pm 593 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$142 \mathrm{ms} \pm 539 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$42.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-32.137 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$600 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.20 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}2.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph