H-6096: Add debug logging to npm release workflow

[CiaranMn]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

This PR adds more verbose logging to our npm release workflow, as there are still errors which are not described in the current output (I have tried to debug locally but the relevant commands all work without error, even in a fresh clone of the repo).

This PR also sets block-design-system to private as we don't need to publish new versions.

[cursor]

PR Summary

Adds robust debugging to the npm release workflow and prevents publishing of an internal package.

• In release.yml, enables verbose logs (NPM_CONFIG_LOGLEVEL=verbose, TURBO_LOG_LEVEL=debug, TURBO_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1) and adds failure handlers to print npm/turbo logs and upload them as artifacts
• Sets libs/@hashintel/block-design-system/package.json private: true to avoid publishing

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 7643260. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Review	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jan 27, 2026 0:50am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jan 27, 2026 0:50am

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Adds verbose npm/turbo logging and failure-time log collection to the Release GitHub Actions workflow to better diagnose npm publish issues.
Also: Marks @hashintel/block-design-system as private to prevent publishing new versions.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. 4 suggestions posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 18 untouched benchmarks
🗄️ 12 archived benchmarks run¹

---

_{Comparing cm/publishing-debug-logs (7643260) with main (9125fd4)²}

Footnotes

1. 12 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them. ↩

2. No successful run was found on main (b7a126d) during the generation of this report, so 9125fd4 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

Your organization requires reapproval when changes are made, so Graphite has dismissed approvals. See the output of git range-diff at https://github.com/hashintel/hash/actions/runs/21397618990

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with Cloud Agents, enable Autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 60.11%. Comparing base (e05657c) to head (7643260).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8327      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   60.11%   60.11%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1235     1235              
  Lines      118164   118164              
  Branches     5173     5173              
==========================================
- Hits        71030    71029       -1     
- Misses      46308    46309       +1     
  Partials      826      826              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.41% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.14% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.61% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	46.65% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	81.77% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	88.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.332 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.659 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.507 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 266 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.302 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 129 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.512 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$26.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 160 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-38.257 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-82.195 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$11.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-63.011 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.183 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.663 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.453 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 36.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.284 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.376 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.777 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.732 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.045 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.760 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$38.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.130 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$76.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 330 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.074 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$44.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 171 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.233 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$46.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 220 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$54.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.688 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$40.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 180 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$420 \mathrm{ms} \pm 893 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.619 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$96.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 358 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.115 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$86.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 455 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$286 \mathrm{ms} \pm 813 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.470 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$18.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 114 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.575 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 95.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.277 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 158 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 333 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 260 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$30.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 305 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 284 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 231 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.070 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 248 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$29.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.487 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$29.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 278 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.538 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 260 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.298 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$47.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 222 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.441 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$95.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.671 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$53.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 236 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.049 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$60.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.824 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$69.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 321 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.852 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$75.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 331 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.384 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$51.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 273 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.543 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$77.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 336 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.066 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$57.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 281 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.226 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.478 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$68.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 351 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.197 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$67.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 361 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.693 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$144 \mathrm{ms} \pm 577 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$138 \mathrm{ms} \pm 408 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$40.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 177 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-61.555 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$581 \mathrm{ms} \pm 907 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.676 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph