H-6341: Update Cargo dependencies and fix stdout writer

[TimDiekmann]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Updates Rust dependencies to their latest versions and fixes a compatibility issue with the anstream crate in the compiletest runner.

🔗 Related links

• ...

🚫 Blocked by

• ...

🔍 What does this change?

• Updates multiple Rust crates including clap (4.5.60 → 4.6.0), AWS SDK crates, bon macros, borsh, and various other dependencies
• Adds a new anstream version 1.0.0 alongside the existing 0.6.21 version to handle version conflicts
• Consolidates darling crate versions by removing the older 0.21.3 version and standardizing on 0.23.0
• Fixes compilation issue in hashql-compiletest by changing from anstream::stdout() to std::io::stdout()
• Updates winnow parser crate with both 0.7.15 and 1.0.0 versions for different dependencies

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

⚠️ Known issues

🐾 Next steps

🛡 What tests cover this?

• Existing test suite should verify compatibility with updated dependencies

❓ How to test this?

1. Checkout the branch
2. Run cargo build to ensure all dependencies compile correctly
3. Run the test suite to verify functionality remains intact
4. Test the compiletest runner specifically to confirm the stdout fix works

📹 Demo

[cursor]

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Moderate risk because it bumps a wide set of Rust dependencies (including clap, AWS SDK crates, and parsing/terminal-output libs) which can introduce subtle compile/runtime behavior changes, though no application logic changes are apparent beyond dependency wiring.

Overview
Updates the Rust dependency set via Cargo.lock, bumping numerous crates (notably clap, AWS SDK crates, toml/winnow, and various utility/proc-macro deps) and adjusting the lockfile to accommodate new major versions alongside older ones where required.

Adjusts hashql-compiletest to depend on anstream with the auto feature enabled, aligning stdout/terminal detection behavior with the updated anstream/clap dependency graph.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 733aeee. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 19, 2026 3:44pm
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 19, 2026 3:44pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 19, 2026 3:44pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 19, 2026 3:44pm

[TimDiekmann]

• H-6341: Update Cargo dependencies and fix stdout writer #8563 👈 (View in Graphite)
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates Rust dependency lockfile entries and adjusts the HashQL compiletest “human” UI to avoid an anstream compatibility issue after dependency upgrades.

Changes:

• Refreshes many Cargo dependencies to newer versions (via Cargo.lock changes).
• Introduces an additional anstream version in the workspace to help resolve transitive version conflicts.
• Consolidates certain dependency versions (e.g., aligns darling to a single newer version) to reduce duplication.
• Updates parser-related dependencies (e.g., winnow) to accommodate upstream requirements.
• Fixes build breakage in hashql-compiletest by switching its stdout writer from anstream::stdout() to std::io::stdout().

Technical Notes: The compiletest runner’s output path now uses the standard library stdout handle, which may affect color/ANSI behavior depending on the environment.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. 1 suggestion posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.49%. Comparing base (e0e4091) to head (733aeee).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8563      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.60%   62.49%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files        1317     1318       +1     
  Lines      133977   134211     +234     
  Branches     5517     5517              
==========================================
  Hits        83877    83877              
- Misses      49185    49419     +234     
  Partials      915      915              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.40% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.16% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.52% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	26.39% <ø> (-0.34%)	⬇️
rust.hash-graph-store	37.76% <ø> (-0.13%)	⬇️
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	29.69% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	69.13% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	92.64% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing t/h-6341-bump-transitive-cargo-dependencies (733aeee) with main (1512579)}

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 224 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.275 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.367 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 109 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.625 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 347 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.815 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 125 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.749 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 190 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.813 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.902 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.487 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.936 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.304 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.188 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.353 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.897 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.447 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.134 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.242 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.146 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.723 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.537 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.149 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.636 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$45.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 164 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.966 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$83.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 404 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.096 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$51.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 324 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$53.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$63.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 414 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$47.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.413 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$424 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.29 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.232 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 588 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.497 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$92.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 383 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.297 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$322 \mathrm{ms} \pm 694 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$19.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.818 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$20.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 126 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.401 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 116 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.305 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$20.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.955 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$24.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 130 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.610 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.082 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.625 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$20.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 138 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 117 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.051 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$26.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.021 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$36.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$34.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$35.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 345 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.151 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$35.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 355 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$34.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.671 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$35.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 327 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$35.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 251 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.083 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$36.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$36.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 284 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 47.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.745 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$92.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 424 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.707 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$145 \mathrm{ms} \pm 735 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.828 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$100.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 457 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.409 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 486 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.102 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 524 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.132 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$124 \mathrm{ms} \pm 483 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.342 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$100 \mathrm{ms} \pm 502 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.181 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$128 \mathrm{ms} \pm 423 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.549 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 625 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.215 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$116 \mathrm{ms} \pm 593 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.063 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 434 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.141 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 519 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.095 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 473 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.409 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$141 \mathrm{ms} \pm 525 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.921 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 628 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.125 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$583 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.28 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}3.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph