Update Rust crate pin-project to v1.1.12

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
pin-project	workspace.dependencies	patch	1.1.11 → 1.1.12

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

taiki-e/pin-project (pin-project)

v1.1.12

Compare Source

• Documentation improvements.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
• Automerge
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Error		May 6, 2026 7:34am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 6, 2026 7:34am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 6, 2026 7:34am

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Lockfile-only dependency bump of pin-project/pin-project-internal with no production code changes; low risk aside from potential build/compatibility issues from updated transitive resolution.

Overview
Updates the Rust dependency lockfile to bump pin-project (and pin-project-internal) from 1.1.11 to 1.1.12.

Also normalizes winnow lockfile entries by dropping the older 0.7.15 package and referencing the remaining 1.0.2 resolution without an explicit version suffix.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 553dba3. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the Rust workspace dependency pin-project from v1.1.11 to v1.1.12.

Changes: Regenerates the lockfile to reflect the patch-level bump; upstream notes indicate documentation-only improvements.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.09%. Comparing base (e8f59de) to head (553dba3).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8702   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.08%   62.09%           
=======================================
  Files        1341     1341           
  Lines      135078   135078           
  Branches     5744     5744           
=======================================
+ Hits        83862    83870    +8     
+ Misses      50308    50302    -6     
+ Partials      908      906    -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.41% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.87% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.35% <ø> (+0.12%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.52% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	26.38% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	37.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	29.63% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	69.13% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	92.64% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.06% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing deps/rs/pin-project-1.x-lockfile (553dba3) with main (e8f59de)}

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.129 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.715 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.317 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 350 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.020 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 153 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.566 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.268 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 198 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.194 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.998 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.510 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.625 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.298 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.221 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.215 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.261 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.199 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.187 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.680 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.988 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.388 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.813 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.595 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.179 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.960 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.710 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.511 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.302 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.564 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.330 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.461 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.257 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.308 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$55.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 325 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.564 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$45.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 210 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.492 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$51.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 198 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.320 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 343 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.160 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$61.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 346 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.956 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$61.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.582 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$55.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.165 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 498 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.295 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$46.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 260 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.726 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$293 \mathrm{ms} \pm 894 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.806 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$18.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 121 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.385 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$19.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 111 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.450 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$20.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 116 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.657 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$18.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 107 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.632 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$25.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 118 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.355 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.255 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 100 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.057 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.454 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.826 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$26.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 191 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.846 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$33.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 312 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.986 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$33.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.057 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$34.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 268 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.051 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$34.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 306 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.800 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$33.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 362 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.854 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$34.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 356 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.279 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$34.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.313 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$34.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 341 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.969 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$35.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 49.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.016 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$92.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 510 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.976 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 715 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.863 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$99.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 613 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.850 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 525 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.504 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 670 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.138 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$127 \mathrm{ms} \pm 571 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.916 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 582 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.286 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 506 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.818 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 717 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.256 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 634 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.185 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 612 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.676 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 590 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.352 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$191 \mathrm{ms} \pm 830 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$153 \mathrm{ms} \pm 515 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-22.871 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$42.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-61.383 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$538 \mathrm{ms} \pm 937 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.089 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph