Skip to content

Update sentry-rust monorepo to 0.48.0#8715

Open
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/rs/sentry-rust-monorepo
Open

Update sentry-rust monorepo to 0.48.0#8715
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/rs/sentry-rust-monorepo

Conversation

@hash-worker
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot commented May 13, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change Pending
sentry (source) workspace.dependencies minor 0.47.0 → 0.48.0 0.48.2 (+1)
sentry-core (source) workspace.dependencies minor 0.47.0 → 0.48.0 0.48.2 (+1)
sentry-types (source) workspace.dependencies minor 0.47.0 → 0.48.0 0.48.2 (+1)

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

getsentry/sentry-rust (sentry)

v0.48.0

Compare Source

Breaking Changes
New Features

📊📈💯 The Sentry-Rust SDK now supports emitting Sentry Metrics (#​1073)!

To get started, you will need to add the metrics feature flag when compiling the sentry crate. You will also need to enable metrics when initializing the SDK, like so:

use sentry::ClientOptions;

let _guard = sentry::init((
    "(your DSN here)",
    ClientOptions {
        enable_metrics: true,
        // ... other options ...
        ..Default::default()
    },
));

You can then capture metrics as follows:

use sentry::metrics;
use sentry::types::protocol::latest::Unit;

// We support counter, gauge, and distribution metrics.
metrics::counter("example.counter", 1).capture();
metrics::gauge("connections", 20).capture();
metrics::distribution("response.time", 123.4)
    .unit(Unit::Millisecond) // units can also be set on gauges
    .attribute("http.status", 200) // attributes can be set on all metric types
    .capture();
Fixes
  • Fixed several feature additivity SemVer violations, where enabling a feature flag could have introduced breaking changes. All known violations are fixed now, so simply enabling an additional feature flag in any Sentry SDK crate should no longer cause any public API breakages. Fixing these issues required us to break the public API in some places; those breakages are detailed above.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
  • Automerge
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge May 13, 2026 00:01
@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel Bot commented May 13, 2026 •
edited
Loading

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
hash Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 13, 2026 0:14am
hashdotdesign-tokens Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 13, 2026 0:14am
petrinaut Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 13, 2026 0:14am

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot requested a review from a team May 13, 2026 00:01
@hash-worker
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

hash-worker Bot commented May 13, 2026

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update artifacts related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: Cargo.toml
Artifact update for sentry resolved to version 0.48.2, which is a pending version that has not yet passed the Minimum Release Age threshold.
Renovate was attempting to update to 0.48.0
This is (likely) not a bug in Renovate, but due to the way your project pins dependencies, _and_ how Renovate calls your package manager to update them.
Until Renovate supports specifying an exact update to your package manager (https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/issues/41624), it is recommended to directly pin your dependencies (with `rangeStrategy=pin` for apps, or `rangeStrategy=widen` for libraries)
See also: https://docs.renovatebot.com/dependency-pinning/
File name: Cargo.toml
Artifact update for sentry-core resolved to version 0.48.2, which is a pending version that has not yet passed the Minimum Release Age threshold.
Renovate was attempting to update to 0.48.0
This is (likely) not a bug in Renovate, but due to the way your project pins dependencies, _and_ how Renovate calls your package manager to update them.
Until Renovate supports specifying an exact update to your package manager (https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/issues/41624), it is recommended to directly pin your dependencies (with `rangeStrategy=pin` for apps, or `rangeStrategy=widen` for libraries)
See also: https://docs.renovatebot.com/dependency-pinning/
File name: Cargo.toml
Artifact update for sentry-types resolved to version 0.48.2, which is a pending version that has not yet passed the Minimum Release Age threshold.
Renovate was attempting to update to 0.48.0
This is (likely) not a bug in Renovate, but due to the way your project pins dependencies, _and_ how Renovate calls your package manager to update them.
Until Renovate supports specifying an exact update to your package manager (https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/issues/41624), it is recommended to directly pin your dependencies (with `rangeStrategy=pin` for apps, or `rangeStrategy=widen` for libraries)
See also: https://docs.renovatebot.com/dependency-pinning/

@cursor
Copy link
Copy Markdown

cursor Bot commented May 13, 2026 •
edited
Loading

PR Summary

Low Risk
This is a dependency-only update (sentry, sentry-core, sentry-types) with no production code changes; risk is primarily build/runtime behavior changes from the upstream SDK update.

Overview
Updates workspace sentry, sentry-core, and sentry-types dependencies from 0.47.0 to 0.48.0 in Cargo.toml.

Refreshes Cargo.lock to pull in 0.48.2 of the Sentry crates (and associated checksums), with no other code changes.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 5a787e6. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label May 13, 2026
@augmentcode
Copy link
Copy Markdown

augmentcode Bot commented May 13, 2026

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the Rust Sentry SDK workspace dependencies to the 0.48.x line.

Changes:

  • Bumped sentry, sentry-core, and sentry-types from 0.47.0 → 0.48.0 in the workspace Cargo.toml
  • Regenerated Cargo.lock accordingly

Technical Notes: Sentry 0.48 introduces upstream API changes (notably around ClientOptions/Scope and new metrics-related options); this PR itself is dependency-only and relies on downstream crates compiling cleanly against the updated SDK.

🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎

augmentcode[bot]
augmentcode Bot reviewed May 13, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@augmentcode augmentcode Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 13, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.32%. Comparing base (add3967) to head (5a787e6).

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8715   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.31%   62.32%           
=======================================
  Files        1354     1354           
  Lines      137003   137003           
  Branches     5792     5792           
=======================================
+ Hits        85373    85383   +10     
+ Misses      50724    50716    -8     
+ Partials      906      904    -2
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.41% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils 2.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 90.87% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec 84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net 96.37% <ø> (+0.15%) ⬆️
rust.harpc-tower 67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol 92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec 72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api 2.52% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization 62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store 26.81% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store 37.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning 47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation 83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast 87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest 29.63% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core 82.44% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics 72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval 62.99% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir 89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir 92.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr 94.06% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 13, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

Comparing deps/rs/sentry-rust-monorepo (5a787e6) with main (e96d352)1

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (add3967) during the generation of this report, so e96d352 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 13, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$26.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.646 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.486 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001 $$11.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.414 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$38.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.008 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 95.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.825 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526 $$20.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.798 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$27.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 156 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.465 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.893 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$12.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.747 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$3.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.82 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51 $$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$4.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107 $$3.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$3.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.032 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.049 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.173 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.205 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.47 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.855 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1 $$2.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.431 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.68 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.102 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.725 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$2.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.438 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.289 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25 $$2.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.742 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$2.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.726 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.040 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.298 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$2.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.323 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.798 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.960 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$48.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$38.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 150 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.191 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$43.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 180 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.703 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$38.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 224 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$54.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.079 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$54.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.944 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$48.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.705 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$93.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 704 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$39.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.712 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$262 \mathrm{ms} \pm 743 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.259 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.431 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$17.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 130 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.896 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$17.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.263 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$22.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 122 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.536 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.062 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.187 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.304 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$17.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.145 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$24.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.142 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$32.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.550 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$31.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.582 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$32.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 276 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.325 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$31.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 260 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.516 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$32.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 353 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 274 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.760 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$31.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.364 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$32.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.833 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$31.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 260 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.406 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$6.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.611 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$96.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 464 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$140 \mathrm{ms} \pm 654 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.083 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 663 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.615 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 503 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.080 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 366 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.906 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 488 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.370 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$99.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 437 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.832 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$125 \mathrm{ms} \pm 733 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.055 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 557 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.357 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 669 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.983 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 433 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.398 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 453 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.159 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$156 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.68 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-4.905 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 457 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-22.210 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$37.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 133 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-22.217 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$504 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.07 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@augmentcode augmentcode[bot] augmentcode[bot] left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

@indietyp indietyp

@TimDiekmann TimDiekmann

Labels

area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area)

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@indietyp @TimDiekmann