SRE-749: Enforce minimum-release-age in mise

[indietyp]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

This updates the mise configuration to enforce a minimum mise version requirement and adds a minimum_release_age setting to avoid picking up freshly released tool versions. It also switches the d2 tool from the ubi backend to the github backend.

🔍 What does this change?

• Adds a hard minimum mise version requirement of 2026.4.22
• Adds a minimum_release_age = "5d" setting to prevent tools from being updated to releases that are less than 5 days old
• Switches terrastruct/d2 from the ubi: backend to the github: backend (breaks d2)

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

🛡 What tests cover this?

• None; this is a tooling configuration change.

❓ How to test this?

1. Checkout the branch
2. Run mise install and confirm tools resolve correctly

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 3, 2026 1:24pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Jun 3, 2026 1:24pm

1 Skipped Deployment

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	Jun 3, 2026 1:24pm

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Dev and container build tooling only; no application runtime, auth, or data-path changes.

Overview
Aligns local and CI/Docker tooling on mise ≥ 2026.4.22 and adds minimum_release_age = "5d" so mise won’t pick tool releases newer than five days.

.config/mise/config.toml sets min_version, the new setting under [settings], and pins npm:renovate to 43.202.1 (down from 43.207.4), consistent with the release-age guard. README prerequisites and the version check block now call out the mise floor. Five app Dockerfiles install mise via MISE_VERSION=2026.4.22 instead of 2026.3.3.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 4cc1454. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[indietyp]

• SRE-749: Enforce minimum-release-age in mise #8810 👈 (View in Graphite)
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Updates the repo’s mise toolchain configuration to enforce a minimum mise version and reduce exposure to newly released tool versions, while switching d2 installs to the GitHub backend.

Changes:

• Added a hard min_version requirement for mise (2026.4.12).
• Added [settings].minimum_release_age = "5d" to avoid resolving very recent releases.
• Switched terrastruct/d2 from the ubi: backend to the github: backend.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.08%. Comparing base (91e50f0) to head (edb124e).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8810   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.08%   59.08%           
=======================================
  Files        1343     1343           
  Lines      129731   129731           
  Branches     5866     5866           
=======================================
+ Hits        76651    76652    +1     
+ Misses      52177    52176    -1     
  Partials      903      903           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.41% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	2.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.87% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.19% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.52% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	26.74% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	37.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	28.26% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	79.28% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.53% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	75.69% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	86.94% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.06% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing bm/sre-749-enforce-minimum-release-age-in-mise (4cc1454) with main (1726d73)¹}

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on main (9c570da) during the generation of this report, so 1726d73 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit a4d4c44. Configure here.}

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

[TimDiekmann]

Could you update the minimum required mise version in the README please?

[indietyp]

@TimDiekmann done in f1949bc

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 7 comments.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.259 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 105 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 379 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.981 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 156 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 178 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.357 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.190 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.532 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.419 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.882 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.609 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$54.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 396 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.574 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$46.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 254 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.918 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$50.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 321 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.947 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$44.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 256 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-18.619 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$63.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 517 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.268 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$62.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 396 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$56.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 440 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 573 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$46.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 393 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.759 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$325 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.06 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}18.7 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 148 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$20.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 138 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.879 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 143 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$19.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.696 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$25.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 126 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 143 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.876 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.140 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 139 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.684 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$27.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$35.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 343 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$37.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 382 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$36.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 327 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$36.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 320 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$36.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 329 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$35.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 278 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$35.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$35.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 373 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.685 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$36.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 390 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$95.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 495 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$150 \mathrm{ms} \pm 756 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.361 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 534 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 613 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 694 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.959 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$130 \mathrm{ms} \pm 667 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 613 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.664 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$135 \mathrm{ms} \pm 693 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.732 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$113 \mathrm{ms} \pm 766 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.291 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 636 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.346 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 798 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.898 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$124 \mathrm{ms} \pm 700 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$164 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.85 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-13.906 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 737 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-25.983 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$41.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$573 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.32 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}7.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph