Skip to content

Conversation

@mdumandag
Copy link
Contributor

We forget to update the code that sets socket options while doing #219.

The code now handles the given socket options tuple correctly. Also,
added some tests that verifies this.

@mdumandag mdumandag added this to the 4.0 milestone Dec 11, 2020
@mdumandag mdumandag self-assigned this Dec 11, 2020
@mdumandag mdumandag force-pushed the socket-options-handling branch from 8d54837 to eb6509f Compare December 11, 2020 13:13
We forget to update the code that sets socket options while doing hazelcast#219.

The code now handles the given socket options tuple correctly. Also,
added some tests that verifies this.
@mdumandag mdumandag force-pushed the socket-options-handling branch from eb6509f to a4f2d11 Compare December 11, 2020 13:16
@mdumandag
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks a lot for the review Andrey

@mdumandag mdumandag merged commit 06f16e4 into hazelcast:master Dec 11, 2020
@mdumandag mdumandag deleted the socket-options-handling branch December 11, 2020 13:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants