Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 29, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
typescript-eslint (source) 8.46.3 -> 8.48.0 age confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (typescript-eslint)

v8.48.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.47.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.46.4

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - Only on Sunday and Saturday ( * * * * 0,6 ) (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 29, 2025

Coverage Status

coverage: 94.595%. remained the same
when pulling 7776d79 on renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo
into 2b20fbd on main.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 508aaaa to 7776d79 Compare November 29, 2025 05:09
@renovate renovate bot merged commit d9c86a9 into main Nov 29, 2025
10 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch November 29, 2025 08:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants