Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Reasoning as Supportive Context for Machine Translation

📄 Reasoning as Supportive Context for Machine Translation: A Case Study on Hindi to Bengali Language Pair

Paper DOI


📖 Overview

This repository contains the implementation, experiments, and resources for the research paper:

Reasoning as Supportive Context for Machine Translation: A Case Study on Hindi to Bengali Language Pair

This work investigates how structured reasoning can improve machine translation by acting as supportive contextual guidance during translation generation.


🖼 Pipeline Architecture

Pipeline Architecture

Overall framework of reasoning-guided Hindi → Bengali machine translation.


🧠 Reasoning Components

The framework introduces five reasoning categories:

ID Reasoning Type
R1 Key Terms
R2 Syntactic
R3 Semantic
R4 Pragmatic
R5 Paraphrase

The study performs exhaustive experiments across all:

31 reasoning combinations


🚀 Key Findings

  • Increasing reasoning signals does not always improve translation
  • Translation quality depends on reasoning composition
  • Excessive reasoning may introduce noisy contextual signals
  • The best-performing combination is:

Semantic (R3) + Paraphrase (R5)

  • Guided inference significantly improves translation quality

💡 Core Idea

Reasoning is not generated as the final output.

Instead, reasoning acts as:

Supportive context to guide machine translation


🗂 Dataset

Training Data

  • 36,040 parallel sentence pairs

Test Data

  • 2,000 sentence pairs

Domains

  • Agriculture
  • Tourism
  • Governance
  • Climate
  • Healthcare
  • Science & Technology
  • Judiciary
  • Education

⚙️ Methodology

Training

  • Instruction-tuned base model
  • LoRA fine-tuning
  • Structured reasoning prompts
  • Full reasoning ablation study

Inference Modes

  1. Zero-Reasoning Inference
  2. Guided Inference using optimal reasoning subset

📈 Results Summary

The table below shows the BLEU scores obtained across different domains for multiple reasoning configurations and fine-tuning setups.

Model Results

Performance comparison of LoRA and full fine-tuning models across different domains.

Key observations from the experiments:

  • Among LoRA-based models, R3 + R5 achieved the best overall performance
  • Using all five reasoning signals together reduced translation quality
  • Full fine-tuning significantly outperformed LoRA configurations
  • Guided inference consistently improved results over normal inference
  • The best overall system was:

Full SFT: R3 + R5 (Guided Inference) with an overall BLEU score of 23.86


📚 Citation

If you use this work, please cite:

@article{EAMT26-IITP,
  title={Reasoning as Supportive Context for Machine Translation: A Case Study on Hindi to Bengali Language Pair},
  author={Singh, Kshetrimayum Boynao and Singh, Saksham and Pakray, Partha and Ekbal, Asif},
  booktitle={Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation},
  publisher={European Association for Machine Translation (EAMT)}
}

⭐ Acknowledgement

This work contributes toward reasoning-enhanced machine translation for low-resource Indian languages and multilingual NLP research.

About

Reasoning as Supportive Context for MT: A Case Study on Hindi to Bengali Language Pair

Resources

Stars

2 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages