tooling: trim the extractor-pin comment to what xff needs - #406
Merged
Conversation
The #405 comment narrated the fork's own changelog (which PR added which --bcce flag); that is the referenced module's history, not xff's to carry. Keep only the xff-relevant fact: it is the helly25 fork and our script uses its --bcce-* flags.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The comment added in #405 narrated the fork's changelog (which PR added which
--bcceflag) - that is the referenced module's history, not xff's to carry. Trimmed to the one xff-relevant fact: it's the helly25 fork andcompile_commands-update.shuses its--bcce-*flags.