Skip to content

Publish a reading take on painting with p5.brush code - #55

Merged
0thernet merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/reading-paint-with-code-277b
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

Publish a reading take on painting with p5.brush code#55
0thernet merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/reading-paint-with-code-277b

Conversation

@0thernet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Adds one original crawlable Atet reading take at /reading/paint-with-code, with the matching markdown twin, sitemap entries, Accept negotiation, and headers used by the other /reading/* pages.

The page is a product take, not a reprint of the Hraness Reading digest. It starts from Surya Narreddi’s Training AI to Paint with Code and argues that the artefact you keep after a model paints is editable p5.brush code, not a sealed raster or a longer Omni-style prompt. Atet capabilities mentioned on the page are only those already on the live home. Thursday’s Gaussian take and Friday’s Omni take now point at this URL.

Expected live path: https://atet.sh/reading/paint-with-code

Sources (linked, not pasted):

Required interlinks:

Editorial banner reviewed at 1536×864 and 384×216 card size. No text, UI, or product chrome. Distinct from the Gaussian splat flower and the Omni timeline frames.

Open in Web Open in Cursor 

Add an original crawlable Atet page at /reading/paint-with-code. The
argument is that the artefact you keep after a model paints is editable
code, not a sealed raster or a longer prompt.

Co-authored-by: ben <0thernet@users.noreply.github.com>
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
atet Ready Ready Preview Aug 31, 2026 1:25pm

Request Review

@0thernet
0thernet marked this pull request as ready for review August 31, 2026 13:49
@0thernet
0thernet merged commit 66cfc62 into main Aug 31, 2026
15 checks passed
@0thernet
0thernet deleted the cursor/reading-paint-with-code-277b branch August 31, 2026 13:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants