Report actionable authoring diagnostics without exposing internal bookkeeping - #68
Merged
Conversation
7 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem and change
Rejected authoring proposals and full plans now return stable diagnostic codes, source locations when verified, affected declarations/assets, and supported next actions through the existing report format. Coverage differences are bounded to 12 entries with totals and categories; exact coverage validation remains enforced.
Stale references retain their source path and node/reference identity without presenting foreign offsets as current locations. Unsupported native mappings explain their limitation, and filesystem dependency failures are distinguished from design decisions.
Validation
npm_config_script_shell=/usr/bin/truefor that direct check only); all other checks ran normally.Closes #64.