-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
feat: enabled CodeQL #492
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: enabled CodeQL #492
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces comprehensive updates to the GitHub Actions workflows and adds a new CodeQL configuration file. The changes focus on enhancing the Continuous Integration (CI) process by implementing security checks, standardizing workflow naming conventions, and introducing CodeQL analysis. The modifications span multiple workflow files, including adding a new CodeQL workflow, updating testing procedures, and refining build and deployment processes across different components of the project. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/frontend.yaml (1)
Line range hint
43-43: Fix broken job dependency.The
deployjob still depends on the old job namebuild, but the job has been renamed tobuild-and-deploy. This will cause the workflow to fail.- needs: build + needs: build-and-deploy
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/config/codeql.yaml (1)
7-8: Consider extending CodeQL analysis with additional query suites.While the
security-and-qualitysuite provides good coverage, consider adding language-specific suites for more comprehensive analysis:queries: - uses: security-and-quality # Additional recommended suites - uses: security-extended - uses: javascript-security-extended.github/workflows/build.yaml (1)
Line range hint
22-24: Consider using major version only for Node.js.Using a specific patch version (
20.9.0) might be too restrictive. Consider using only the major version to automatically get security updates:with: - node-version: 20.9.0 + node-version: 20.github/workflows/tests.yaml (1)
54-58: Fix typo and enhance test reporting.
- Fix the typo in "compoenent"
- Add test result reporting for better visibility:
- - name: Run Vitest for compoenent testings + - name: Run Vitest for component testing if: steps.filter.outputs.ui == 'true' working-directory: ./web-frontend run: | - npx vitest run + npx vitest run --reporter=default --reporter=junit --outputFile=./test-results.xml + - name: Upload test results + if: always() && steps.filter.outputs.ui == 'true' + uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 + with: + name: test-results + path: web-frontend/test-results.xml🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
[warning] 15-58: Workflow does not contain permissions
Actions Job or Workflow does not set permissions
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
.github/config/codeql.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/backend.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/build.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/codeql.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/frontend.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/git-pr-release.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/tests.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/triage-issues.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/triage-pull-requests.yaml(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- .github/workflows/git-pr-release.yaml
- .github/workflows/triage-pull-requests.yaml
- .github/workflows/backend.yaml
- .github/workflows/triage-issues.yaml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
.github/workflows/tests.yaml
[warning] 15-58: Workflow does not contain permissions
Actions Job or Workflow does not set permissions
[warning] 23-23: Unpinned tag for a non-immutable Action in workflow
Unpinned 3rd party Action 'Tests CI' step Uses Step: filter uses 'dorny/paths-filter' with ref 'v3', not a pinned commit hash
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/codeql.yaml
29-29: the runner of "github/codeql-action/init@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
35-35: the runner of "github/codeql-action/analyze@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
| on: | ||
| pull_request: | ||
| workflow_dispatch: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add workflow-level permissions declaration.
Following the principle of least privilege, explicitly declare workflow-level permissions:
permissions: read-all| - name: Filter Path | ||
| uses: dorny/paths-filter@v3 | ||
| id: filter | ||
| with: | ||
| filters: '.github/config/paths-filter.yaml' | ||
| # https://github.com/dorny/paths-filter |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Pin third-party action to specific commit.
For security, pin the dorny/paths-filter action to a specific commit hash instead of using a tag:
- uses: dorny/paths-filter@v3
+ uses: dorny/paths-filter@4512585405ef951d0fe8899ba468f8d5e711e2e3 # v3📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - name: Filter Path | |
| uses: dorny/paths-filter@v3 | |
| id: filter | |
| with: | |
| filters: '.github/config/paths-filter.yaml' | |
| # https://github.com/dorny/paths-filter | |
| - name: Filter Path | |
| uses: dorny/paths-filter@4512585405ef951d0fe8899ba468f8d5e711e2e3 # v3 | |
| id: filter | |
| with: | |
| filters: '.github/config/paths-filter.yaml' | |
| # https://github.com/dorny/paths-filter |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
[warning] 23-23: Unpinned tag for a non-immutable Action in workflow
Unpinned 3rd party Action 'Tests CI' step Uses Step: filter uses 'dorny/paths-filter' with ref 'v3', not a pinned commit hash
Issue/PR link
closes: #475
What does this PR do?
Describe what changes you make in your branch:
(Optional) Additional Contexts
Describe additional information for reviewers (i.e. What does not included)
mainto confirm changes would be appliedSummary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Workflow Updates
Chores