Skip to content

Conversation

@hwakabh
Copy link
Owner

@hwakabh hwakabh commented Jan 14, 2025

Issue/PR link

closes: #475

What does this PR do?

Describe what changes you make in your branch:

  • unified workflow IDs with kebab-cases
  • split build steps and (unit) test steps into separated workflows with same trigger events
  • added CodeQL CI with configuration files

(Optional) Additional Contexts

Describe additional information for reviewers (i.e. What does not included)

  • e2e testings are not included in this PR, since this requires merge into main to confirm changes would be applied

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added CodeQL analysis workflow for enhanced code security and quality.
    • Introduced a new tests workflow for automated testing on pull requests.
  • Workflow Updates

    • Renamed multiple GitHub Actions workflow jobs for consistency.
    • Updated workflow environments to Ubuntu 24.04.
    • Streamlined build and deployment processes for frontend and backend.
    • Added a new CodeQL configuration file to enhance static analysis capabilities.
  • Chores

    • Removed some testing steps from existing workflows.
    • Updated GitHub Actions configurations.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces comprehensive updates to the GitHub Actions workflows and adds a new CodeQL configuration file. The changes focus on enhancing the Continuous Integration (CI) process by implementing security checks, standardizing workflow naming conventions, and introducing CodeQL analysis. The modifications span multiple workflow files, including adding a new CodeQL workflow, updating testing procedures, and refining build and deployment processes across different components of the project.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/config/codeql.yaml New CodeQL configuration file added with security and quality query references
.github/workflows/backend.yaml Renamed job from image_build_and_push to build-and-ship
.github/workflows/build.yaml Renamed job from build_and_test to build-apps, removed testing steps
.github/workflows/codeql.yaml New workflow added for CodeQL security analysis
.github/workflows/frontend.yaml Renamed job from build to build-and-deploy
.github/workflows/git-pr-release.yaml Renamed job from git_pr_release to git-pr-release
.github/workflows/tests.yaml New workflow added for running tests
.github/workflows/triage-issues.yaml Renamed job from triage_issue to triage-issue
.github/workflows/triage-pull-requests.yaml Renamed job from triage_pr to triage-pr

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Implement security check using CodeQL
Add workflows triggered on PR commits

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 54571a0 and 34d4f39.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/codeql.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/tests.yaml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/codeql.yaml
  • .github/workflows/tests.yaml

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added ci Topics on workflows or automations deploy Features depending on application runtimes labels Jan 14, 2025
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/frontend.yaml (1)

Line range hint 43-43: Fix broken job dependency.

The deploy job still depends on the old job name build, but the job has been renamed to build-and-deploy. This will cause the workflow to fail.

-    needs: build
+    needs: build-and-deploy
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/config/codeql.yaml (1)

7-8: Consider extending CodeQL analysis with additional query suites.

While the security-and-quality suite provides good coverage, consider adding language-specific suites for more comprehensive analysis:

queries:
  - uses: security-and-quality
  # Additional recommended suites
  - uses: security-extended
  - uses: javascript-security-extended
.github/workflows/build.yaml (1)

Line range hint 22-24: Consider using major version only for Node.js.

Using a specific patch version (20.9.0) might be too restrictive. Consider using only the major version to automatically get security updates:

   with:
-    node-version: 20.9.0
+    node-version: 20
.github/workflows/tests.yaml (1)

54-58: Fix typo and enhance test reporting.

  1. Fix the typo in "compoenent"
  2. Add test result reporting for better visibility:
-    - name: Run Vitest for compoenent testings
+    - name: Run Vitest for component testing
     if: steps.filter.outputs.ui == 'true'
     working-directory: ./web-frontend
     run: |
-      npx vitest run
+      npx vitest run --reporter=default --reporter=junit --outputFile=./test-results.xml
+    - name: Upload test results
+      if: always() && steps.filter.outputs.ui == 'true'
+      uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+      with:
+        name: test-results
+        path: web-frontend/test-results.xml
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL

[warning] 15-58: Workflow does not contain permissions
Actions Job or Workflow does not set permissions

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a84295 and bff1388.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • .github/config/codeql.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/backend.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/build.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/codeql.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/frontend.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/git-pr-release.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/tests.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/triage-issues.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/triage-pull-requests.yaml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • .github/workflows/git-pr-release.yaml
  • .github/workflows/triage-pull-requests.yaml
  • .github/workflows/backend.yaml
  • .github/workflows/triage-issues.yaml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
.github/workflows/tests.yaml

[warning] 15-58: Workflow does not contain permissions
Actions Job or Workflow does not set permissions


[warning] 23-23: Unpinned tag for a non-immutable Action in workflow
Unpinned 3rd party Action 'Tests CI' step Uses Step: filter uses 'dorny/paths-filter' with ref 'v3', not a pinned commit hash

🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/codeql.yaml

29-29: the runner of "github/codeql-action/init@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


35-35: the runner of "github/codeql-action/analyze@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

Comment on lines +3 to +5
on:
pull_request:
workflow_dispatch:
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add workflow-level permissions declaration.

Following the principle of least privilege, explicitly declare workflow-level permissions:

permissions: read-all

Comment on lines +22 to +27
- name: Filter Path
uses: dorny/paths-filter@v3
id: filter
with:
filters: '.github/config/paths-filter.yaml'
# https://github.com/dorny/paths-filter
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Pin third-party action to specific commit.

For security, pin the dorny/paths-filter action to a specific commit hash instead of using a tag:

-    uses: dorny/paths-filter@v3
+    uses: dorny/paths-filter@4512585405ef951d0fe8899ba468f8d5e711e2e3  # v3
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Filter Path
uses: dorny/paths-filter@v3
id: filter
with:
filters: '.github/config/paths-filter.yaml'
# https://github.com/dorny/paths-filter
- name: Filter Path
uses: dorny/paths-filter@4512585405ef951d0fe8899ba468f8d5e711e2e3 # v3
id: filter
with:
filters: '.github/config/paths-filter.yaml'
# https://github.com/dorny/paths-filter
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL

[warning] 23-23: Unpinned tag for a non-immutable Action in workflow
Unpinned 3rd party Action 'Tests CI' step Uses Step: filter uses 'dorny/paths-filter' with ref 'v3', not a pinned commit hash

@hwakabh hwakabh added security Changes with security perspectives tests Changes on test codes labels Jan 14, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the tests Changes on test codes label Jan 15, 2025
@hwakabh hwakabh merged commit 10e6cec into main Jan 15, 2025
7 checks passed
@hwakabh hwakabh deleted the security/475/codeql branch January 15, 2025 01:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci Topics on workflows or automations deploy Features depending on application runtimes security Changes with security perspectives

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

feat(ci): implement security check

2 participants