licence: correct the last prose still asserting MIT / Palimpsest terms - #162
Merged
Conversation
The tree-wide normalisation (#161) fixed every SPDX identifier and licence declaration, but five prose passages in subtrees still told a reader the code was under different terms: - frontier-practices/README.adoc: 'licensed under the Palimpsest-MPL License v3.0 (PMPL-1.0)', plus a badge whose alt-text read PMPL-1.0 while its image said MPL-2.0 - frontier-practices/tabletop/README.adoc: 'Licensed under MIT + Palimpsest v0.8' - playground/hives/me/CONTRIBUTING.md: told contributors their work would be licensed under the MIT License - playground/PALIMPSEST.adoc: asserted PMPL-1.0, mirroring the root file already converted in #159 — same treatment, now a historical note All now state MPL-2.0 for code and CC-BY-SA-4.0 for documentation. Verified: no .md/.adoc asserts a non-MPL/CC licence; the tree contains exactly two SPDX identifiers; hooks/validate-spdx.sh passes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
![gitar-bot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/827041?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #161. That PR normalised every SPDX identifier and
licensedeclaration, but a licence is also what the prose tells a reader — and five passages in subtrees still said something different:frontier-practices/README.adoc— "licensed under the Palimpsest-MPL License v3.0 (PMPL-1.0)", plus a badge whose alt-text readPMPL-1.0while the image itself said MPL-2.0frontier-practices/tabletop/README.adoc— "Licensed under MIT + Palimpsest v0.8"playground/hives/me/CONTRIBUTING.md— told contributors their work would be licensed under the MIT License, which is the passage most likely to actually mislead someoneplayground/PALIMPSEST.adoc— asserted PMPL-1.0, mirroring the root file already converted in docs: truth pass across human, machine, and wiki documentation + DEBT register #159; given the same historical-note treatmentAll now state MPL-2.0 for code and CC-BY-SA-4.0 for documentation.
Verified: no
.md/.adocasserts a non-MPL/CC licence · the tree contains exactly two SPDX identifiers (426 MPL-2.0 / 206 CC-BY-SA-4.0) ·hooks/validate-spdx.shpasses.🤖 Generated with Claude Code