fix: secure legacy database path#4
Merged
Merged
Conversation
ichwars
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 10, 2026 11:07
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
safe_join_under()Root cause
The PrintOps migration retained support for a legacy database filename assembled at runtime. Joining that dynamic name directly with
settings.base_dirwas rejected by the repository's unsafe-path regression test.Validation
pytest backend/tests/unit/test_no_unsafe_path_joins.py backend/tests/integration/test_system_api.py --tb=short(34 passed)ruff check backend/app/api/routes/system.pyruff format --check backend/app/api/routes/system.pygit diff --check