Skip to content

Conversation

@X-oss-byte
Copy link

No description provided.

Banbarashik and others added 9 commits August 11, 2023 21:59
remove misused pronoun "it"

Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
### What?

Now that we have wasm support (and support for `?module`) `@vercel/og` should be supported

### Turbopack updates

* vercel/turborepo#5677 
* vercel/turborepo#5660 

Closes WEB-138
### What?

Update swc crates to swc-project/swc@54f38cb

### Why?

To apply minifier bugfixes.

### How?

Closes WEB-1358
Fixes vercel#53723

---

turbopack counterpart: vercel/turborepo#5699
Adds support for base64-encoded `placeholder`. Enables using placeholders without the "blur" effect.

Fixes vercel#47639
- [x] Add support for DataURL placeholder
- [x] Add tests
- [x] Update docs

Co-authored-by: Steven <229881+styfle@users.noreply.github.com>
Previous of after (before in linked issue)
```
❯ pnpm add --save-dev @next/eslint-plugin-next
Already up to date
Progress: resolved 525, reused 517, downloaded 0, added 0, done
Done in 6.4s
```

Resolves vercel#53937
…ary (vercel#53703)

### What?

We change the not-found rendering strategy to the origin one which recovers the not found error from the flight data, and hit the error boundary to display the closet not found component.

For parallel `@slot` we shouldn't pass down the not-found boundary, the boundary is only for `@children`.

### Why?

We're having a lot of not-found matching issues that manually searching for not found and layout won't be accurate as we have various scenarios like `(group)` routes, dynamic routes, etc.

### How?

Only render html with empty body so that the error can recover from flight and render the proper not-found component during hydration.

One change for metadata is that we need to get the "not-found" metadata in the initial render, so we'll catch the not-found error once there first and start render the "not-found" metadata and put it in the flight data. Then when it recovers it's still preserved.

Fixes vercel#53694
@X-oss-byte X-oss-byte closed this Aug 12, 2023
@X-oss-byte X-oss-byte reopened this Aug 12, 2023
@ijjk ijjk closed this Aug 14, 2023
ijjk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2023
vercel#57504)

…7448)"

This reverts commit 17bd232.

<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:

## For Contributors

### Improving Documentation

- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide

### Adding or Updating Examples

- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md

### Fixing a bug

- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md

### Adding a feature

- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md


## For Maintainers

- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change

### What?

### Why?

### How?

Closes NEXT-
Fixes #

-->
@Dargon789 Dargon789 mentioned this pull request Jan 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants