Adding procedure for SNMP traps#141
Conversation
leifmadsen
left a comment
leifmadsen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Awesome! Looks good to me.
|
Great, thank you! |
| [id="configuring-snmp-traps_{context}"] | ||
| = Configuring SNMP Traps | ||
|
|
||
| {Project} ({ProjectShort}) can deliver alerts via SNMP Traps. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@csibbitt This may or not be relevant but I'll ask anyway. Why would I want to use SNMP Traps?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You can understand SNMP Traps as alert or notification.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enabling SNMPtraps functionality allows for defined PrometheusRules that would result in a fired alert via Alertmanager to be consumed by the prometheus-snmp-webhook pod via webhook receiver, for ultimate delivery to an SNMPtrap receiver.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why would I want to use SNMP Traps?
To integrate STF with an existing infrastructure monitoring platform that receives notifications via SNMP traps.
…traps.adoc Co-authored-by: JoanneOFlynn2018 <45287002+JoanneOFlynn2018@users.noreply.github.com>
…traps.adoc Co-authored-by: JoanneOFlynn2018 <45287002+JoanneOFlynn2018@users.noreply.github.com>
…traps.adoc Co-authored-by: JoanneOFlynn2018 <45287002+JoanneOFlynn2018@users.noreply.github.com>
JoanneOFlynn2018
left a comment
JoanneOFlynn2018
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi Chris,
Made a change to the intro.
Also, wondering if SNMP Traps should live in the Alerts section? Don't want to slow down the process any more than I have already. We can change this at a later date if needs be!
That makes a lot of sense actually, especially since the configuration is under the |
4 participants
No description provided.