feat(rust/c509-certificate): Update to version 11

[bkioshn]

Description

Currently c509-certificate crate follows draft 9, update it to draft 11.
Version 11: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert/11/
Version 9: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert/09/

Related Issue(s)

Closes #19
Blocks #49

Description of Changes

Differences between 9 and 11 for the current implementation

• OID PEN is removed
• Fix type time, should be unsigned integer
• Msg field version - the type can be a natively signed C509 certificate following X.509 v3 (c509CertificateType = 2) or a CBOR re-encoded X.509 v3 DER certificate (c509CertificateType = 3)
• issuer -> if issuer same as subject, issuer is set to null
• subject shouldn’t be null
• Relative distinguished name is removed
• Update documents
• New TBSCertificate

 TBSCertificate = (
       c509CertificateType: int,
       certificateSerialNumber: CertificateSerialNumber,
        issuerSignatureAlgorithm: AlgorithmIdentifier,
       issuer: Name / null,
       validityNotBefore: ~time,
       validityNotAfter: ~time / null,
       subject: Name,
       subjectPublicKeyAlgorithm: AlgorithmIdentifier,
       subjectPublicKey: any,
       extensions: Extensions,
    )

Breaking Changes

• New CBOR sequence of TBSCertificate
• OID PEN is not supported
• Relative Distinguished Name is removed and use Attributes instead
• Message field version change

Please confirm the following checks

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream module

[stevenj]

LGTM

[github-actions]

✅ Test Report | ${\color{lightgreen}Pass: 199/199}$ | ${\color{red}Fail: 0/199}$ |

[stevenj]

LGTM