Skip to content

Conversation

@adamsmo
Copy link
Contributor

@adamsmo adamsmo commented Jun 19, 2017

No description provided.

import io.iohk.ethereum.utils.ByteUtils
import org.spongycastle.crypto.digests.{SHA1Digest, SHA256Digest}
import org.spongycastle.crypto.engines.AESFastEngine
import org.spongycastle.crypto.engines.AESEngine
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@adamsmo why was this changed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

org.spongycastle.crypto.engines.AESFastEngine is deprecated now

logs: Seq[TxLog]
)

//TODO extract to top level because it is used in FilterManager.scala
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this need to be addressed in this PR?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this should be addressed after #218 is merged

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, I would merge this one and create a new task, what do you think?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added EC-209

receipt: Receipt <- receipts.lift(txIndex)
} yield {

//transaction with contract creation 0xb7b8cc9154896b25839ede4cd0c2ad193adf06489fdd9c0a9dfce05620c04ec1
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor detail: What does 0xb7b8cc9154896b25839ede4cd0c2ad193adf06489fdd9c0a9dfce05620c04ec1 represent? From the tests it seems to be the hash of a tx, maybe we should remove this comment?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@adamsmo adamsmo Jun 20, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nwm I thought this is EthServiceSpec, I will remove it

Copy link
Contributor

@AlanVerbner AlanVerbner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link

@ntallar ntallar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@adamsmo adamsmo merged commit 3b73194 into phase/4/jsonrpc Jun 21, 2017
@adamsmo adamsmo deleted the feature/getTransactionReceipt branch June 27, 2017 12:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants