Skip to content

docs: layerdrop-6ep subset 2.6495 #123

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
ronaldtse merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2026
Merged

docs: layerdrop-6ep subset 2.6495 #123

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 12 additions & 0 deletions docs/RESULTS.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -448,3 +448,15 @@ FOURTH subset-overstatement instance and the most dramatic (subset
delta 0.72 -> full delta 2.28, a 3.2x inflation). The full-set-only
publication rule earns its keep here: this entry is the paper's
strongest measurement-discipline exhibit.

## ara-diac-small-layerdrop-6ep — subset 2.6495 (2026-09-01)

A2 (TODO.improve-compare): the lite rung with G2a's full lever set
(6 epochs, Muon, r7 labels, half depth). 300-subset: teacher in-run
1.3014, student **2.6495**, paired bootstrap delta 1.4842
[1.079, 1.975], p=0. The epochs lever moved the lite rung 3.81 -> 2.65
(full-depth moved 3.66 -> 2.01): most of the optimization gain
transfers at half depth; the depth cost widened from 0.15pp (3ep) to
0.64pp (6ep) on this subset. Full-set gate in flight - the honest
number per the four-instance subset-overstatement record. First lite
verdict carrying its own CI.
Loading