Conversation
cc7e9a4 to
003201c
Compare
003201c to
d92f65d
Compare
|
Came to complain about doing the redirect in JS, but stayed to congratulate @lidel on doing it so tastefully |
|
|
||
| ### Where do you email/send the DMCA Notice? | ||
| The quickest way is to email it to abuse@ipfs.io. If you prefer, you can instead send it to: | ||
| The quickest way is to email it to **abuse@ipfs.network**. If you prefer, you can instead send it to: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@lidel, note that this is NOT functional yet - abuse@ is considered a reserved name, and I couldn't set it up as an alias. I did setup abuse-reports@ipfs.network that will forward to abuse@ipfs.io for now. Once we change the primary domain in Google Workspace, this will not be an issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've extracted email migration to separate PR: #142
|
Updated this PR to use |
1357488 to
22a1601
Compare
protocol/bifrost-infra#178 (comment) Email still @ipfs.io -- will update in separate PR.
22a1601 to
be906bc
Compare
|
This is unblocked and https://ipfs.tech should already work. |
| '@nuxtjs/speedcurve', | ||
| '~/modules/nuxt-module-ipfs', | ||
| ['nuxt-canonical', { baseUrl: 'https://ipfs.io' }], | ||
| ['nuxt-canonical', { baseUrl: 'https://ipfs.tech' }], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ℹ️ this takes care of canonical link and SEO migration
Switching to location.replace() because is ensures replaced .io URLs will not be saved in browser history
ba6caa2 to
5d77c4a
Compare
* refactor: switch emails to @ipfs.tech This is a follow-up to #133 Part of protocol/bifrost-infra#2018
* refactor: switch emails to @ipfs.tech This is a follow-up to ipfs/ipfs-website#133 Part of https://github.com/protocol/bifrost-infra/issues/2018
* refactor: switch emails to @ipfs.tech This is a follow-up to ipfs/ipfs-website#133 Part of https://github.com/protocol/bifrost-infra/issues/2018
This PR changes the canonical address of IPFS project's website from
ipfs.iotoipfs.techContext: https://github.com/protocol/bifrost-infra/issues/178#issuecomment-1195867284
TODO
ipfs.networkdomain (smoke-test before we got final one)ipfs.techdomain