Create safe diagnostic records for failed reviews - #68
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: bed56904ce
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
bed5690 to
1d53c61
Compare
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 1d53c61ecf
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
1d53c61 to
ac8267d
Compare
c15bf01 to
61ecce8
Compare
ac8267d to
d9ff1f8
Compare
# Conflicts: # docs/content/cli.mdx # scripts/cli-args.mjs # scripts/generate-summaries.mjs # scripts/present.mjs # tests/present-help.test.mjs
Closes #35
Summary
Stack
This PR must wait for both blockers.
Verification
npm cinpm run lintnpm test— 91 passednpm run docs:checknpm run docs:buildnpm run fallow:audit -- --changed-since origin/codex/issue-034-cache-concurrencynpm pack --ignore-scripts --dry-run --json— confirmsscripts/support-record.mjsshipsStack