This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2022. It is now read-only.
Fix #22156: Bug in annotation handling in case of container annotation handlers#22198
Closed
mskdeepak-oracle wants to merge 1 commit intojavaee:masterfrom
Closed
Fix #22156: Bug in annotation handling in case of container annotation handlers#22198mskdeepak-oracle wants to merge 1 commit intojavaee:masterfrom
mskdeepak-oracle wants to merge 1 commit intojavaee:masterfrom
Conversation
Member
Author
|
@glassfishrobot Run CI Tests please |
Contributor
|
Starting CI tests run |
Contributor
|
All CI tests successful |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reopening PR #22164
Fix #22156 - Using a plural annotation such as AdministeredObjectDefinitionsHandler would lead to a call to the processAnnotation function of its singular version AdministeredObjectDefinitionHandler. During this, the ejbProvider is not passed properly leading to a bug in the handling of these annotations.
I have added an additional constructor to facilitate this. Changed the code in all plural annotation handlers.