Небольшая логическая ошибка#888
Merged
lex111 merged 1 commit intojavascript-tutorial:masterfrom Mar 16, 2020
oblogin:patch-1
Merged
Небольшая логическая ошибка#888lex111 merged 1 commit intojavascript-tutorial:masterfrom oblogin:patch-1
lex111 merged 1 commit intojavascript-tutorial:masterfrom
oblogin:patch-1
Conversation
Я бы добавил упоминание и про while, раздел называется **For, while**, а про while не слова, т.е. неявно подразумевается что **while** работает так же как и **for**, но явное лучше неявного.
javascript-translate-bot
added
the
review needed
|
|
lex111
approved these changes
Mar 16, 2020
javascript-translate-bot
added
needs +1
Member
|
@oblogin спасибо! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Я бы добавил упоминание и про while, раздел называется For, while, а про while не слова, т.е. неявно подразумевается что while работает так же как и for, но явное лучше неявного.