Skip to content

Plan 175: close out — mark check-performance gate complete - #415

Merged
jeduden merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/zen-volta-MEaT7
May 27, 2026
Merged

Plan 175: close out — mark check-performance gate complete#415
jeduden merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/zen-volta-MEaT7

Conversation

@jeduden

@jeduden jeduden commented May 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Closes out plan/175_check-performance-gate.md. The substantive work landed across two merged PRs:

What this PR changes

  • Flip plan/175_check-performance-gate.md frontmatter status: "🔳""✅".
  • Check off task 11 (mdsmith-parity engine gap). Its own Pass-2 verdict already concludes "No further cheap win remains; closing the rumdl parity gap from here needs the multiplexed-walk refactor tracked as its own scoped work, not another guard." That refactor is tracked as separate scoped work (the AST-walk multiplexing thread, plans 187/189/190).
  • Check off the open acceptance line "CI check-bench and bench-fragments pass on this branch" — satisfied by the merged PRs' own CI runs and re-confirmed locally in task 10.
  • Regenerate the PLAN.md catalog via mdsmith fix PLAN.md.

Verification

  • go run ./cmd/mdsmith check . — 377 files, 0 failures.
  • No code changes; only the plan file and the generated catalog row in PLAN.md move.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01UDqPB3Jm2y3htZiyZT1ff4


Generated by Claude Code

The substantive work landed via #328 (CI gate, benchmarks,
profiler, fragment-driven docs) and #331 (Pass-1 optimisations,
−38% latency). Task 11 (cheap-win loop on mdsmith-parity) is
out of cheap wins per its own Pass-2 verdict; the remaining
multiplexed-walk lever is tracked as separate scoped work. The
"CI check-bench / bench-fragments pass on this branch"
acceptance line is satisfied by the merged PRs' own CI runs.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01UDqPB3Jm2y3htZiyZT1ff4
@jeduden
jeduden marked this pull request as ready for review May 27, 2026 21:09
@jeduden
jeduden merged commit 91021d5 into main May 27, 2026
23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants