Skip to content

add ancestry/age-based BuildChooser branch filter#173

Closed
kostmo wants to merge 2 commits into
jenkinsci:masterfrom
kostmo:age-based-build-chooser
Closed

add ancestry/age-based BuildChooser branch filter#173
kostmo wants to merge 2 commits into
jenkinsci:masterfrom
kostmo:age-based-build-chooser

Conversation

@kostmo
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kostmo kostmo commented Oct 6, 2013

Selects branches to build based on commits contained in their ancestry.

This is useful for introducing new Jenkins jobs that are specific to some new feature in the repo, without causing retroactive builds of (potentially thousands of) branches that do not support that feature.

@buildhive
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Jenkins » git-plugin #391 FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
(what's this?)

@ndeloof
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ndeloof commented Oct 6, 2013

I'd prefer this to be implemented as an extension (see recent refactoring branch, now merged into master), so that we don't get the main configuration "polluted" with hundred options as it has been with previous releases (git plugin had two nested "advanced" sections ...)

Other possible implementation option is for buildChooser to expose it's own configuration in job form, this is not the case yet. Seems a reasonable change for such use-case

@jenkinsadmin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thank you for a pull request! Please check this document for how the Jenkins project handles pull requests

@cloudbees-pull-request-builder
Copy link
Copy Markdown

plugins » git-plugin #128 FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request

@cloudbees-pull-request-builder
Copy link
Copy Markdown

plugins » git-plugin #129 FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request

@MarkEWaite
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

As far as I can tell, this is now implemented and available in git plugin 2.3.1.

@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite closed this Dec 6, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants