Skip to content

Grammar for @reverse should describe content-model #636

@gkellogg

Description

@gkellogg

In an email to the list, it is noted that the grammar section never describes what the possible values of @reverse are, although the API makes this clear.

The syntax document should either reference the grammar for @id, or duplicate it.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions