🔒 Fix XSS vulnerability by strictly configuring DOMPurify#12
Conversation
Co-authored-by: julesklord <801266+julesklord@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
🎯 What: An XSS vulnerability existed where DOMPurify was used without explicit configuration inside a dangerouslySetInnerHTML block.
⚠️ Risk: Relying on default configuration of sanitization libraries can leave edge case vulnerabilities or fail strict code scanning checks, allowing potential malicious script execution.
🛡️ Solution: Configured DOMPurify with an explicit ALLOWED_TAGS and ALLOWED_ATTR list to strictly enforce expected structure and safely render syntax-highlighted code.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 18079693561575940036 started by @julesklord