-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
[Utilities] throw correct error if get_fallback fails #2413
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this needed ?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added the try defensively to all methods. But the issue is that
get_fallbackmight be used by something that doesn't support getting theConstraintFunction. That might be because it isn't implemented, or it might be because the model uses aZerosBridge(or similar). We should throw the proper error, instead of throwing whatever error actually threw, like "can't unbridge the Zeros bridge."In the Cbc case, it's something like
CachingOptimizer(LazyBridgeOptimizer(CachingOptimizer(Cbc))The outer cache says "can you get ConstraintPrimal." The bridge says yes. Ends up erroring, falling back to
get_fallback, and then errors when it tries to unbridge.If it thew
GetAttributeNotAllowed, then the outer cache would fallback toget_fallbackand this would succeed.Even if it didn't have an outer cache to fall back do, we should throw the correct
GetAttributeNotAllowedfor consistency.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't this also fixed by throwing a
GetAttributeNotAllowedfor the ZerosBridge ?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we don't see the error of the zerosbridge then the user won't know he just has to remove this bridge, that's an issue
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What we could do is throw a custom error here:
MathOptInterface.jl/src/Bridges/Variable/map.jl
Lines 582 to 586 in 0249cfa
Here we try catch:
MathOptInterface.jl/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl
Line 2384 in 0249cfa
If we see exactly this error, we thro a
GetAttributeNotAllowedforConstraintFunctionwith the error message of:MathOptInterface.jl/src/Bridges/Variable/map.jl
Lines 582 to 586 in 0249cfa
otherwise, we rethrow
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This would address this particular issue with ZerosBridge, but it ignores with wider issue.
get_fallbackmay fail, and instead of throwing a nice error, we may throw some arbitrary error. But perhaps you're right, we can just disable ZerosBridge for now in Cbc.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue with this error is that it's difficult to debug since it provides no information on the initial error. Also, I'm not sure all the issues with
ZerosBridgewill go throughget_fallbackso I feel it's easier to fix at the source as I suggested in my previous comment