This was generated by AI during triage.
What to build
Classify the VS Code large-target parse errors from #81 before the Phase 4 decision document is finalized.
The #81 profile succeeded, but the Rust run reported 46 parse errors. Phase 4 should not require zero parse errors on a real large repository, because some files are intentionally malformed fixtures or prompt-heavy test inputs. It does need a taxonomy so rollout decisions do not hide real JS/TS syntax gaps.
Scope
Use the raw artifact from #81:
docs/benchmarks/2026-06-13-rust-indexing-core-phase-4-vscode-profile.raw.json
Classify each parse error into one of:
- Intentional invalid fixture / malformed test input.
- Generated or prompt-heavy source not meant as normal app code.
- Real supported JS/TS syntax gap.
- Unknown.
Acceptance criteria
Agent notes
Do not turn this into a requirement for 0 parse errors. The goal is decision-quality classification.
What to build
Classify the VS Code large-target parse errors from #81 before the Phase 4 decision document is finalized.
The #81 profile succeeded, but the Rust run reported 46 parse errors. Phase 4 should not require zero parse errors on a real large repository, because some files are intentionally malformed fixtures or prompt-heavy test inputs. It does need a taxonomy so rollout decisions do not hide real JS/TS syntax gaps.
Scope
Use the raw artifact from #81:
docs/benchmarks/2026-06-13-rust-indexing-core-phase-4-vscode-profile.raw.jsonClassify each parse error into one of:
Acceptance criteria
Agent notes
Do not turn this into a requirement for
0 parse errors. The goal is decision-quality classification.