Require explicit struct types in literals and destructuring - #193
Merged
Conversation
someone235
force-pushed
the
typed-struct-lit
branch
from
August 3, 2026 05:50
aa956eb to
7d3680d
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #157
Struct literals and destructuring patterns now carry an explicit struct name. Struct values are checked nominally instead of being inferred from matching field layouts, making same-shaped
structs unambiguous across assignments, state readers, template validation, and struct arrays.
Language Behavior Changes
Anonymous literals such as
{ orderId: orderId, ... }are no longer supported.